This Week’s Fun & Fancy Word: Wamblecropt!

wamblecropt

This Week’s Fun & Fancy Word Is:

wamblecropt

This fancy (but perhaps not so fun) word describes how you feel after eating 100 Kit Kat bars. Or an entire birthday cake. Or you had too many margaritas at your birthday party. And the word sounds like the physical feeling of being overcome with nausea…  a mishmash of the rumble in your stomach and the wobble in your step.

Etymology:
Origins Of The Word Wamblecropt

Middle English (1300-50) wamlen; akin to Danish vamle to become nauseated, Latin Vomere to vomit + crop a term for stomach + ed. [1] Wamblecropt (also wamble-cropped) first appeared in the Abecedarium Anglico Latinum of 1552. [2]

Find A Caboodle
Of Fun & Fancy Words Here.

Endnotes:

[1]  wamblecropt: Merriam Webster.com 

[2]  Huloet, Richard. Abecedarium Anglico Latinum, pro tyrunculis Richardo Huloeto exscriptore. London: [S. Mierdman] ex officina Gulielmi Riddel, 1552. https://archive.org/details/abcedariumanglic00hulo/page/n407/mode/2up




Independent Bookstores Are Booming!

independent bookseller day - Open sign on door of bookstore

O
 ..frabjous day! Callooh! Callay! The number of independent bookstores in the U.S. has jumped by 70% over the past five years. According to the American Booksellers Association, 422 new bookstores opened in 2025 alone.[1] That’s fabulous news for these sanctuaries of knowledge and imagination.

Book lovers of all stripes know the joy of discovering a new favorite novel. Or sifting through the shelves for hours to find a story (more likely a few of them) that piques your interest, and teaches you something new.

Your local bookseller will definitely have some recommendations. And there might be a cozy corner with a comfy chair to curl up in once you’ve found the perfect book. You don’t get that welcoming vibe from Amazon.

But keep in mind that bookstores are more than simply a place to pick up your next read…   though, that’s clearly pretty great all by itself.  As Amanda Gorman, the youngest inaugural poet in U.S. history, reminds us:

Independent bookstores are vital hubs of creativity and community.[2]

.

Many indie bookshops take on the role of a town square. And offer events like book signings with an emerging author, discussion groups that dive into the latest bestseller, or readings for children –  events which foster connections that bring together communities of all ages and demographics.

They function as what sociologist Ray Oldenburg famously termed “third places.” [3] Third places are locations outside of work and home, where people can gather and connect. Bookstores have clearly become more than just places to buy books, though that’s obviously a big part of it. They’re a place to meet other people, foster conversation, and bolster neighborhood ties. 

Independent booksellers also play a significant role in the battle against book banning. They consistently take a stand against censorship, and champion books that have been challenged or banned.

They’re a critical part of the ecology of reading and access to information. Because bookstores play a crucial role in providing physical access to books in states where public libraries are under threat of censorship, like Texas, Missouri, and Florida.[4]

So, Join In The Nation-wide Celebration
At Your Local Indie Bookstore.

Kick up your heels at one of the more than 40 bookstore crawls being hosted across the country. Head to the street fair your local bookstore may have organized. Or take in one of the “Meet the Author” events that are frequently part of Independent Bookstore Day celebrations.

But don’t limit your jubilation about the awesomeness of independent bookstores to today. Make a visit to your local indie bookstore part of your usual routine.

Here’s a list of independent bookstores
across the country to help with that:

Alaska

  • Fireside Books in Palmer, Alaska

Arizona

  • Bookmans in Tucson, Mesa, Phoenix and Flagstaff

California

  • Bart’s Books in Ojai
  • Bodhi Tree Bookstore† in Los Angeles (eventually West Hollywood)
  • The Book Shop in Hayward
  • Book Soup in West Hollywood
  • Booksmith in San Francisco
  • Borderlands Books in San Francisco
  • Bound Together Anarchist Collective Bookstore in San Francisco
  • City Lights Bookstore in San Francisco
  • Copperfield’s Books in Napa
  • The Castro (San Francisco)
  • Burbank
  • Green Apple Books & Music in Richmond District (San Francisco)
  • Kepler’s Books in Menlo Park
  • The Last Bookstore in Los Angeles
  • Libélula Books & Co. in Barrio Logan, San Diego
  • Marcus Books in San Francisco and Oakland
  • Mysterious Galaxy in San Diego and Redondo Beach
  • The Other Change of Hobbit in Berkeley
  • Tia Chucha’s Centro Cultural in Sylmar (Los Angeles)
  • Vroman’s Bookstore in Pasadena

Colorado

  • Tattered Cover in Denver
  • The Book Stop in Wheat Ridge, Colorado | Wheat Ridge]]

Connecticut

  • J. Julia Booksellers in Madison

District of Columbia

  • Busboys and Poets
  • Kramers (bookstore)
  • MahoganyBooks
  • Politics and Prose
  • World Bank Infoshop

Florida

  • Haslam’s Bookstore in St. Petersburg
  • Open Books & Records† in Miami Beach

Georgia

  • Charis Books & More in Decatur
  • For Keeps (bookstore) in Atlanta

Illinois

  • Quimby’s Bookstore in Chicago
  • Seminary Co-op in Chicago
  • Unabridged Bookstore in Chicago
  • Women & Children First in Chicago

Indiana

  • Better World Books in Goshen and Mishawaka
  • Boxcar Books in Bloomington

Iowa

  • ACME Comics & Collectibles in Sioux City
  • Prairie Lights in Iowa City

Kansas

  • Eighth Day Books in Wichita
  • Rainy Day Books in Fairway

Kentucky

  • Joseph-Beth Booksellers in Lexington

Louisiana

  • Iron Rail Book Collective in New Orleans

Maine

  • Sherman’s Maine Coast Book Shops (nine locations)
  • Weiser Antiquarian Books in York

Maryland

  • Daedalus Books in Columbia
  • Red Emma’s Bookstore Coffeehouse in Baltimore

Massachusetts

  • The Bookmill in Montague
  • Grolier Poetry Bookshop in Cambridge
  • Harvard Book Store in Cambridge
  • Lucy Parsons Center in Boston
  • The Odyssey Bookshop in South Hadley
  • Schoenhof’s Foreign Books in Cambridge
  • That’s Entertainment in Worcester

Michigan

  • John K. King Books in Detroit
  • Schuler Books & Music in Grand Rapids

Minnesota

  • Amazon Bookstore Cooperative† in Minneapolis
  • Birchbark Books in Minneapolis
  • Common Good Books in Saint Paul
  • DreamHaven Books in Minneapolis
  • Mayday Books in Minneapolis
  • SubText: a Bookstore in Saint Paul
  • Mager’s & Quinn in Minneapolis

Mississippi

  • Square Books in Oxford

Missouri

  • Left Bank Books in St. Louis

Nevada

  • Gambler’s Book Shop in Las Vegas
  • The Writer’s Block in Las Vegas

New York

  • Albertine Books in Manhattan
  • Bluestockings in Manhattan (1999–)
  • Community Bookstore in Park Slope, Brooklyn
  • A Different Light† in Manhattan
  • Housing Works Bookstore Cafe in Manhattan
  • Levine Books and Judaica in Manhattan
  • The Mysterious Bookshop in Manhattan
  • Pomander Book Shop in Manhattan
  • Printed Matter, Inc in Manhattan
  • Mark’s Bookshop in Manhattan
  • Strand Bookstore in Manhattan (1927–)
  • Unnameable Books in Brooklyn

North Carolina

  • Firestorm Cafe & Books in Asheville
  • Internationalist Books in Chapel Hill

Ohio

  • The Book Loft of German Village in Columbus
  • Two Dollar Radio Headquarters in Columbus

Oregon

  • The Duck Store in Eugene
  • Powell’s Books in Portland
  • Rose City Book Pub

Pennsylvania

  • City Books in Pittsburgh
  • Giovanni’s Room Bookstore in Philadelphia
  • Moravian Book Shop in Bethlehem
  • Wooden Shoe Books and Records in Philadelphia

South Carolina

  • Hub City Bookshop in Spartanburg

Texas

  • BookPeople in Austin

Washington

  • Chin Music Press in Pike Place Market, Seattle
  • Elliott Bay Book Company in Seattle
  • Third Place Books in 3 locations Lake Forest Park, Northeast Seattle, & South Seattle
  • Left Bank Books in Pike Place Market, Seattle

West Virginia

  • Taylor Books in Charleston, West Virginia

Wisconsin

  • Renaissance Books in Milwaukee
  • A Room of One’s Own in Madison
  • Woodland Pattern Book Center in Milwaukee  [5]

Share This Post, Choose a Platform!

Endnotes:

[1] “Indie bookstores are making a shocking, triumphant comeback.” December 18, 2025 Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/91461983/indie-bookstores-are-making-a-shocking-triumphant-comeback 

[2] IndieBound.org https://www.indiebound.org/independent-bookstore-day

[3] Broad, Kate. “A Refuge From Censorship: Why Independent Bookstores Will Save Us.” Literary Hub. July 23, 2025. https://lithub.com/a-refuge-from-censorship-why-independent-bookstores-will-save-us/

[4]  Fernando Alfonso III, “How independent bookstores help in the fight against book banning and why it matters.”  OPB.org  September 24, 2022. https://www.opb.org/article/2022/09/24/independent-bookstores-banned-books/

[5] “List of independent bookstores in the United States.” Wikipedia.org   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_independent_bookstores_in_the_United_States

.

Images:

Independent booksellers.  Photo by Peter Robbins on Unsplash

Engage with your local indie bookseller: Photo by Héctor J. Rivas on Unsplash




This Week’s Fun & Fancy Word: Spondulicks!

fun and fancy word spondulicks

This Week’s Fun & Fancy Word Is:

spondulicks

Mark Twain used this word in Huckleberry Finn. [1] O. Henry used it in Cabbages and Kings. [2] And you might use it if you’re saving up for an upcoming vacation. You’ll want to make sure you have enough spondulicks to bring back some awesome souvenirs. Ya’ know, moolah, cheddar, coin. It’s slang for cash – specifically, a good chunk of spending money. Cha-ching!

Etymology:
Origins Of The Word Spondulicks

Spondulicks is thought to derive from the Greek word spondulox, which is a type of seashell from the genus spondylus… hence spondulicks. Why seashells? The spondylus shell was used as an early form of currency, some 5,000 years ago.[3]

Find A Caboodle
Of Fun & Fancy Words Here.

Endnotes:

[1] Mark Twain. Huckleberry Finn. New York: Charles L. Webster & Co, 1891. Pg 92. https://archive.org/details/adventuresofhuck00twai/page/n7/mode/2up?q=spondulicks

[2] O. Henry. Cabbages & Kings.  New York: Doubleday, Page &  Company, 1918. Pg 15. https://archive.org/details/18cabbageskings00henrrich/page/n7/mode/2up

[3] Ivo D. Cholakov $ Krastyu Chulakev. “Archaeology in Bulgaria, 2007-2009.” American Journal of Archaeology. Volume 114, Number 4, October 2010. Pp 715-41.




Right To Read Day 2026!

Right to read day 2026

T
oday is Right to Read Day!
Why is that important? Because your freedom to read continues to be challenged. It’s also important to note that the attacks on our libraries aren’t just book bans anymore.

The next step toward curtailing our freedom to read has been to cut funding to public libraries, and programs like Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library.[1] Not to mention the Trump administration’s dismantling of the largest grantmaker to libraries, the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).[2]

Then, there’s the legislation designed to impair the ability of libraries, library staff, and library boards to obtain and provide diverse materials, resources, and programming to the communities they serve.

As the American Library Association points out, between January 2025 and March 2026 more than 100 pro-censorship bills have been introduced in state legislatures across the country. At least 40 of those bills involve fines, lawsuits, or even jail time for libraries and library workers who protect their patrons’ right to read.

And a nationwide book ban has actually been introduced in Congress! This bill restricts what can be taught in classrooms to works included in very specific lists. So much for the local control of our schools, and “returning education to parents,” so frequently touted by the same politically conservative groups fomenting the current extreme wave of organized book banning…  like Power2Parent. Oh, the irony.

Right to Read day 2026

PEN America has tracked a breathtaking increase in censorship attempts in libraries and schools around the country that began in 2021. And the data shows that, unlike in previous eras, the majority of book censorship attempts are originating from well-funded advocacy groups like Moms for Liberty, and No Left Turn in Education.[3]

Pressure groups and government entities (rather than parents) initiated 72% of demands to censor books in our schools and public libraries in 2024. [4]  As if that number wasn’t concerning enough, in 2025 92% of all book challenges were initiated by pressure groups, and government officials…  that’s right, 92%.  And less than 3% of challenges were made by individual parents.[5]

right to read 2026

Our Growing Network

Challenges to our freedom to read are real. But so is the growing network of individuals like you, and organizations who continue to share strategies and build momentum in their effort to protect the right to read everywhere.

As ALA president, Lessa Kanani’opua Pelayo-Lozada, stated on the first Right to Read Day, it’s a time to “show our commitment to the First Amendment by doing something concrete to preserve it.”[6]

Why is the issue of
book banning so important?

Have a gander here.

And for use
on today’s day of activism…
and every other day.

Toolkit For Resisting Censorship

Share This Post, Choose A Platform!

Endnotes:

[1] “Mapping the Republican War On Public Libraries.” The Democracy Labs. https://thedemlabs.org/2023/10/03/republican-war-on-public-libraries-map/

Smith, Trovia. “Library funding becomes the ‘nuclear option’ as the battle over books escalates.” NPR. https://www.npr.org/2023/05/04/1173274834/book-bans-library-funding-missouri-texas-ashcroft

[2] Sweeney, Patrick. “The funding crisis facing America’s public libraries.” Candid. September 4, 2025. https://candid.org/blogs/todays-funding-crisis-facing-us-public-libraries/

[3] “Banned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Censor Books in Schools.”  PEN America. https://pen.org/report/banned-usa-growing-movement-to-censor-books-in-schools/

Graff, Harvey J. “Dark money fuels Kansas and Missouri school book banners. Don’t let the minority rule.” The Kansas City Star. April 28, 2022. https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/readers-opinion/guest-commentary/article260788532.html

[4] Book Ban Data. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/bbooks/book-ban-data

[5] “American Library Association releases 2025 Most Challenged Books List as National Library Week Begins.” https://www.ala.org/news/2026/04/american-library-association-releases-2025-most-challenged-books-list-national-library

[6] Albanese, Andrew. “National Library Week to Include ‘Right to Read Day.’” Publishers Weekly. April 20, 2023. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/libraries/article/92074-national-library-week-to-include-right-to-read-day.html

Images:

Right to Read Day: Unite Against Book Bans https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/right-to-read-day/

Our Growing Network: Photo by jing chen on Unsplash




How Is Reading Poetry Like Climbing A Mountain?

poetic terms

P
oetry is one of the most evocative and subtle forms of human expression. It can capture a fountain of emotions about the complexities of life that most of us have difficulty putting into words.  Shakespeare’s sonnets come to mind, of course. But there’s also poetry like that written by Shel Silverstein and Carole Boston Weatherford, whose work speaks to the experiences of children.

Eighteenth-century poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge may have defined prose as “words in their best order.” But he described poetry as “the best words in the best order.”[1] Unfortunately, that doesn’t keep poems from being banned. Plenty of them have been – like Allen Ginsberg’s Howl, Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass, and Gwendolyn Brooks’ We Cool, just to name a few.

poetic terms

A Poem’s Job Is…

Typically, a poem’s job is to come closer to saying something that cannot be expressed in other forms of writing. Sharing insight handed down from the woman she credits with giving her back her voice, Maya Angelou describes poetry as “music written for the human voice.”[2]

Poetry’s job is to suggest an idea, experience, or feeling that you may know but can’t entirely be communicated in any direct or literal way. But poetry’s nuance, and intricate language can also make it confounding.

poetic terms

But… How Is Reading Poetry
Like Mountain Climbing?

Techniques that poets use, like word and line arrangement, sound and rhythm, amplify — and in some cases, multiply — the meaning of words beyond the literal. This gives the reader an impression of an idea or feeling, an experience that can’t quite be put into words, but they know is real.

So, in some ways, reading a poem is like mountain climbing.  Finding handholds and footholds is what enables you to ascend to the formation’s pinnacle, one bit at a time.  In much the same manner, a familiarity with poetic terms, techniques, and devices allows the reader to find metaphoric handholds and footholds — those that facilitate a richer understanding of whatever poem they happen to be reading.

poetic terms

Therefore… to aid in your endeavor to reach those poetic summits, check out this amazingly comprehensive glossary of poetic terms, techniques, and devices from the Poetry Foundation.

They’re an extraordinary resource, whose mission is to amplify poetry, celebrate poets, as well as foster spaces for all to create, experience, and share poetry. And in doing so, they set out to “transform lives through the power of words.”[3]

But the Poetry Foundation isn’t just for individuals wishing to tackle the literary peaks of poetry. They also offer plenty of free resources that educators find useful. In addition to the amazingly comprehensive glossary of poetic terms mentioned above, there are poem samplers and articles on how to read poetry, essays about poets, and guides for cultivating a deeper understanding of particular poems.

So, give Poetry Foundation a whirl
when you’re ready to take on
“the best words in the best order.”

See Below For Related Posts

#The Art of Reading              #Teachers Resources                #Benefits of Humanities

Share This Post, Choose A Platform!

Endnotes:

[1] Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Table Talk.  London: George Bell and Sons, York Street, Covent Garden. 1888. Pg  54.

[2] Moyers, Bill. “A Portrait of Maya Angelou.” https://billmoyers.com/content/maya-angelou/

[3] “Our Mission.” Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/about-us

Images:

Glossary of Poetic Terms: Photo by Eugene Golovesov on Unsplash

A Poem’s Job Is… : Photo by Ashray Dravidian on Unsplash

Reading Poetry Is Like Mountain Climbing: Photo by Lionello DelPiccolo on Unsplash




Leaves Of Grass: A Celebration Of American Democracy

Leaves of Grass

W
alt Whitman (or Uncle Walt as Robin Williams referred to him in the film Dead Poet’s Society) has been described as “the world’s poet of democracy.”[1] And, Leaves of Grass is his visionary collection of poetry celebrating his belief in democracy and the individual’s place in it.

Leaves of Grass was published little more than 60 years after the United States constitution was ratified. And, Whitman considered this recently established democratic governance to be an inevitable evolutionary force in human history.

That said, he was in no way under the illusion that a functioning democratic society would either come easily or emerge quickly in the still-young nation of his day.

He also believed that democracy would fail if it was strictly legislative and legalistic. And, contended that a democratic literature was the most essential factor in urging this evolution along. Because:

That which really balances and conserves the social and political world is not so much legislation, police, treaties, and dread of punishment, as the latent eternal intuitional sense, in humanity, of fairness, manliness, decorum, &c. Indeed, the perennial regulation, control and oversight, by self-suppliance, is sine qua non to Democracy; and a highest, widest aim of Democratic literature may well be to bring forth, cultivate, brace and strengthen this sense in individuals and society.[2]

.
As long as the country’s imagination remained fueled by literature modeled on works produced under the “opposite influences” of aristocracy and hierarchical, authoritarian structures, Whitman maintained, democracy would never flourish.[3]

Leaves of Grass

A Distinctly American Form And Style

When Whitman began writing, American poetry sounded pretty much like its British counterpart. Popular poets of the day, like John Greenleaf Whittier and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, wrote in a manner reminiscent of the Victorian style prevalent in England. Their style revolved around the special, the elect, the few.

So, for reasons pointed out above, Whitman wanted to create an original, distinctly American form and style. One that shifted the focus away from the rich & powerful, and stratified social structures. One that championed the everyday people who make up the heart of democracy. One that quells potential animosity between these everyday people by nurturing understanding and cultivating camaraderie.[4]

Whitman’s primary interest was in the way a democratic self would act rather than the way  democratic society would function. And, he knew that defining this revolutionary new self would require a more equalizing connection between reader and author.[5]

The style Whitman set out to create would be as open, and nondiscriminatory as he imagined an ideal democracy to be. It would reflect the broad spectrum of American experience. And, most importantly, it would be a democratic voice that would serve as a model for society.[6]

And, he did exactly that. Rejecting traditional poetic conventions, Walt Whitman is widely considered to be the “Father of free verse.”[7] This new form of poetry is a loose, informal style, with no rhyme, or no meter. As such, it better captures the natural rhythms of speech.

He constructed a poetry that breaks down the barriers of bias and convention, requiring acts of imaginative absorption on the part of the reader. Whitman’s poetry directly addresses the reader and challenges him to action. All of which results in an enlarging of the self.

Rather than proposing a particular persona, however, Whitman’s Leaves of Grass offers a tool for discovering his own innate wisdom in developing a democratic identity.[8]

Leaves of Grass

Whitman’s Foundational Metaphor

The question for Whitman was always one of the “democratic individual” within an “aggregated, inseparable… democratic nationality.”[9]  Which makes Leaves of Grass more than simply the title of a collection of poetry – it’s Whitman’s foundational metaphor for democracy itself.

As Alexis de Tocqueville pointed out in 1835, America has a tendency to think as a country of “I’s,” rather a nation of “us.”[10] But, Whitman expresses unlimited optimism on this issue, one that tormented America’s founders… the fear that individualism would deter the public virtue of aligning our individual self-interest with that of the republic’s.[11] 

In Whitman’s metaphor, the American people are like grass. No two leaves/blades are alike. Each has a certain kind of individuality. Step back, however, and you’ll see that the leaves/blades are more alike than they are different. Americans can be ourselves to the utmost while also sharing deep kinship with our neighbors.

Who are our neighbors?[12]  All the other leaves/blades of grass around us:

Sprouting alike in broad zones and narrow zones,
Growing among black folks as among white,
Kanuck, Tuckahoe, Congressmen, Cuff, I give them the same, I receive them the same.
[13]

.
Together, the individual leaves/blades of grass create a lush, verdant quilt that covers the ground. And, when you stand back far enough, you don’t see individual leaves/blades at all, but an organic unity.[14]

It’s a visual representation of what Whitman expresses in the line, “what I assume you shall assume”— that is, assume that our common interest in our own freedom is what, above all else, unites us as Americans.[15]

The individual leaves/blades haven’t disappeared, however. A closer looks lets us know  they’re still there, unique and vibrant, no two alike. Whitman’s leaves of grass metaphor is an exquisite example of e pluribus unum, from many one.[16]

Song Of Myself

Song of Myself was given priority as the first poem of the collection Leaves of Grass. And rightly so, because it represents the essence of Whitman’s poetic vision.[17]

Consistent with his grass metaphor for democracy, Whitman’s narrator, the “I” who’s celebrating himself, functions in a dual capacity. He isn’t simply speaking as an individual, but as the voice of an aggregated democratic whole. And, this concept is reiterated throughout the work:

For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. (Section 1)

In all people I see myself, none more and not one a barleycorn less,
and the good or bad I say of myself I say of them.
(Section 20) 

I am large. I contain multitudes. (Section 51)[18]

.
Whitman’s narrator, the “self” in Song of Myself, is clearly speaking as the voice of a equitable collective.

leaves of grass

Whitman’s Grass Metaphor
Also Signifies Equality

As noted above, Whitman considered his poem to be, at least in some measure, and American epic. Unlike the epic poetry of Homer, Virgil, or Dante, however, the “self” in Song of Myself isn’t an archetypal hero.

In the Iliad, Homer catalogues the Greek ships, organized according to the importance of the chieftains and warriors they carried. In Paradise Lost, Milton catalogues the major demons who have been cast into hell.

Song of Myself also includes a catalogue. Significantly, the dual capacity on which Whitman’s grass metaphor functions signifies equality within democratic America as well as unity.

So, in keeping with his grass metaphor, Whitman’s catalogue is comprised of everyday American men and women, all one, and all equal.[19] Here is a mere segment:

The conductor beats time for the band and all the performers follow him,
The child is baptized – the convert is making the first professions,
The regatta is spread on the bay… how the white sails sparkle!
The drover watches his drove, he sings out to them that would stray,
The pedlar sweats with his pack on his back – the purchaser higgles about the odd cent,
The camera and plate are prepared, the lady must sit for her daguerreotype,
The bride unrumples her white dress, the minute hand of the clock moves slowly,
The opium eater reclines with rigid head and just-opened lips,
The prostitute draggles her shawl, her bonnet bobs on her tipsy and pimpled neck,
The crowd laugh at her blackguard oaths, the men jeer and wink to each other,
(Miserable! I do not laugh at your oaths nor jeer you,)
The President holds a cabinet council, he is surrounded by the great secretaries,
[20]

.
Whitman closes his vast list of fellow Americans with the declaration:

By God! I will accept nothing which all cannot have their counterpart of on the same terms.[21]

.
Understanding that we’re all equal is significant. And, what Whitman is dramatizing with his famous catalogues of everyday people doing everyday things is quite simple. He’s making them manifest in our imaginations, so we come to understand that these are our brothers and sisters.[22]

But that’s simply at the individual level of the grass metaphor. Whitman also urges us to move away from our tendency for rivalrous individuality, to expand our larger self. For, the actual subject of his American epic is the expansion of consciousness and spirit, mind and heart.

At the level of a united whole which this metaphor also functions on – that is, when we leave hierarchical thinking behind, stop looking up at those who are purportedly superior to us, and down at those who seem less than us – we’re free from false constraints and can live joyously as part of a community of equals.[23]

leaves of grass

It’s A Conversation

As noted above, the free verse Walt Whitman is credited with inventing better captures the natural rhythms of speech. This observation is especially important given that Song of Myself appears to be a dialogue between Whitman and the reader rather than a literary performance.

Significantly, this conversational dynamic is consistent with Whitman’s grass metaphor, in that it culminates in a comradeship between poet and reader – a merger of equals.[24]

Even more conducive to creating the impression of conversation than the absence of rhyme or meter is Whitman’s practice of posing questions directly to the reader.[25] For example:

Have you reckoned a thousand acres much ? Have you reckoned the earth much?
Have you practiced so long to learn to read ?
Have you felt so proud to get at the meaning of poems?
[26]

.
The passage above appears at the beginning of the work, and Whitman follows it with a declaration:

Stop this day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of all  poems,
You shall possess the good of the earth and sun… there are millions of suns left,
You shall no longer take things at second or third hand… nor look through the
eyes of the dead… nor feed on the spectres in books,
You shall not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me,
You shall listen to all sides and filter them from yourself.[27]

.
At this point, speaker and reader are two separate individuals, with the poet as teacher. By the end of the passage, however, the poet makes it clear that the reader will eventually no longer be a student, that they will ultimately become equals.

By the middle of Song of Myself, Whitman indicates to the reader that they now play a larger role than merely processing the words on the page:

Listener up there! what have you to confide to me?
Look in my face while I snuff the sidle of evening,
Talk honestly, no one else hears you, and I stay only a minute longer.
[28]

.
Obviously, it isn’t possible for the poet to actually listen to what the reader may have to say. This exchange is meant to set the reader’s emotional and intellectual wheels in motion, as the saying goes. It’s intended to engage the reader in a way beyond that of simply ingesting what Whitman tells them. The reader is no longer taking things at second or third hand… or from the poet for that matter.

In the final segments of the poem Whitman returns to his foundational metaphor:

I bequeath myself to the dirt to grow from the grass I love,
If you want me again look for me under your bootsoles.

You will hardly know who I am or what I mean,
But I shall be good health to you nevertheless,
And filter and fibre your blood.
[29]

.
The speaker and reader have now merged, the poet symbolically filtering the reader’s blood, as fibres in their muscles. In true democratic fashion, they function together to nurture the democracy Whitman is celebrating.

In the poem’s concluding stanza, the speaker’s journey is complete:

 

Failing to fetch me at first keep encouraged,
Missing me one place search another,
I stop some where waiting for you.
[30]

.
And now, it’s the reader’s task to carry the democracy that Whitman’s grass symbolizes forward. Fueled by their expanded self, and the democratic spirit conveyed in the poet’s words.

leaves of grass

Democracy Is
Ever Vulnerable

Whitman was no Pollyanna, however – he understood that democracy is ever vulnerable. He realized that the sight of an egalitarian society – with equal people pursuing their goals and desires – can seem chaotic. So, worship of a king – or some form of autocratic leader – is always tempting.

He admonishes us to remember what the revolutionaries fought for. And, just as importantly, what they fought against. When we forget that, Whitman points out, we’re in danger of lapsing back into the way of kings.[31]  The following passage from A Boston Ballad addresses this ever-present concern:

Clear the way there Jonathan!
Way for the President’s marshal! Way for the government cannon!
Way for the federal foot and dragoons… and the phantoms afterward.

I rose this morning early to get betimes in Boston town;
Here’s a good place at the corner… I must stand and see the show.

I love to look on the stars and stripes… I hope the fifes will play Yankee Doodle.

How bright shine the foremost with cutlasses,
Every man holds his revolver… marching stiff through Boston town.
[32]

 .
Whitman is describing the type of procession seen in countries like Fascist Italy, Communist China, or North Korea. Where the leader is held supreme, and military might is on full display as a threatening reminder to the world…  as well as their own people.

He’s alerting us to what’s taking place when we start seeing such displays of concentrated, dominating power. When that happens, we’ve lost sight of the fact that the American revolution was all about fighting a tyrant wielding  just this type of power. We might as well:

Dig out King George’s coffin …. unwrap him quick from the graveclothes…
box up his bones for a journey :
Find a swift Yankee clipper …. here is freight for you, blackbellied clipper,
Up with your anchor! shake out your sails!… steer straight toward Boston bay.

Now call the President’s marshal again, and bring out the government cannon,
And fetch home the roarers from Congress and make another procession and guard
it with foot and dragoons.
 

Here is a centrepiece for them:
Look! All orderly citizens… look from the windows, women!
 

The committee open the box and set up the regal ribs and glue those that will not stay,
And clap the skull on top of the ribs and clap a crown on top of the skull. 

You have got your revenge old buster!… The crown has come to its own and more than its own.[33]

.
How does Whitman advise us to address the fear of chaos, and avoid such a lapse into king-like authoritarian leadership?

By reaffirming the personal bonds of our democracy. By reminding people that we’re involved in what is likely the greatest and most promising social venture of all time…   And most importantly, by emphasizing that this grand American experiment requires hard work and vigilance.[34]

leaves of grass

In Conclusion

Ultimately, Whitman’s message is one of connectedness, kinship defined by receptivity and responsiveness to others.  If we can move away from our addiction to rivalrous individuality, and our proclivity toward hierarchy and authoritarian systems, we can embrace his democratic trope of the grass.

Whitman has taken us on a tour of democracy. He’s shown us what we might achieve by following his lead on the subject. When we make this metaphoric grass the national flag, so to speak, we learn to love and appreciate the people around us. We become a community of equals, which makes us less susceptible to tyrannical leaders.

Benjamin Franklin is credited with saying, our form of government is a republic…  if we can keep it. As Franklin well knew, maintaining a repudiation of hierarchy and authoritarian systems is not so easy.[35] Whitman’s benefits don’t materialize simply by reading his poem. It takes work – to expand our minds and hearts, to see those around us as our brothers and sisters,  to see ourselves as part of a united democratic whole. Democracy takes effort – every day, and from every one of us.

.
That’s my take on Leaves of Grass — what’s yours?
Check out this Discussion Guide to get you started.

Share This Post, Choose a Platform!

Endnotes:

[1] Betsy Erkkila. In “Walt Whitman: Poet of American Democratic Individualism.” By Walter Donway. Online Library, November 30, 2022
https://oll.libertyfund.org/publications/reading-room/2022-11-30-donway-walt-whitman-poet-american-democratic-individualism

[2] Whitman, Walt. Democratic Vistas. Washington, D.C. 1871. Pp 69-70.

[3] Whitman, Walt. Democratic Vistas.  Washington, D.C., 1871. Pg 5.

Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Preface.

[4] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Preface.

[5] Folsom, Ed. “Democracy.” The Walt Whitman Archive. Gen. ed. Matt Cohen, Ed Folsom, & Kenneth M. Price.

[6] “Walt Whitman at 200.” Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/collections/149913/walt-whitman-at-200

Folsom, Ed. “Democracy.” The Walt Whitman Archive. Gen. ed. Matt Cohen, Ed Folsom, & Kenneth M. Price.

[7] Voigt, Benjamin. “Walt Whitman 101.” PoetryFoundation.org  July 1, 2015. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/70243/walt-whitman-101

[8] Hennequet, Claire. “Imagining the Nation. Walt Whitman’s Leaves of grass.”

[9] Whitman, Walt. “Preface, 1872, to As a Strong bird on Pinions Free. (Now, Thou-Mother with thy Equal Brood.)”   Complete Prose Works. Philadelphia: David McKay Publishers, 1892. Pg 279.

[10] De Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Book 2 (Influence of Democracy on the feelings of Americans.) Chapter II.

[11] Donway, Walter. “Walt Whitman: Poet of American Democratic Individualism.” Online Library, November 30, 2022
https://oll.libertyfund.org/publications/reading-room/2022-11-30-donway-walt-whitman-poet-american-democratic-individualism

[12] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 30.

[13] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 16

[14] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 30.

[15] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 13

[16] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 30.

[17] Greenspan, Ezra, ed. Walt Whitman’s “Song of Myself”: A Sourcebook and Critical Edition. New York: Routledge, 2005. Pg 3.

[18] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 13, 26, 53, 55.

[19] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 39.

[20] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 22.

[21] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 29.

[22] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 27.

[23] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 21.

[24] Mason, John B. “Questions and Answers in Whitman’s ‘Confab.’” American Literature. Vol. 51, No. 4 (January 1980) Pg 499.

[25] Mason, John B. “Questions and Answers in Whitman’s ‘Confab.’” American Literature. Vol. 51, No. 4 (January 1980) Pg 493.

[26] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 14.

[27] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 14.

[28] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 55.

[29] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 56.

[30] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 56.

[31] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 56.

[32] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 89.

[33] Whitman, Walt. Leaves of Grass. Washington D.C., 1855. Pg 90.

[34] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 57.

[35] Edmundson, Mark. Song of Ourselves: Walt Whitman and the fight for democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pg 32-33.

Images:

Leaves of Grass: 1st edition cover. Public Domain
A distinctly American form and style: Brady, Matthew. Walt Whitman. Public Domain
Whitman’s foundational metaphor: Photo by Fauzan Saari on Unsplash
Song of Myself: Hollyer, Samuel. Steel engraving of a daguerreotype by Gabriel Harrison.  Morgan Library & Museum. Public Domain
The grass metaphor also signifies equality: Photo by Jonny Gios on Unsplash
It’s a conversation: Photo by Matheus camara da silva on unsplash.com
Democracy is ever-vulnerable: Photo by iStrfry , Marcus on Unsplash
In conclusion: Photo by Zacqueline Baldwin on Unsplash




Speak and Shout From a Man’s Perspective

Speak and Shout

L
aurie Halse Anderson’s book Speak has been accused of being anti-male. There’s also Anderson’s follow-up work Shout: The True Story of a Survivor Who Refused to be Silenced. It’s a poetic memoir written during the height of the MeToo movement, which has been characterized by book banners as containing political propaganda.

But are these books really anti-male? Guest essayist David Winn provides a thoughtful and insightful rebuttal to such accusations.

.

Speak and Shout From a Man’s Perspective

Laurie Halse Anderson’s Speak has faced controversy for decades due to its portrayal of sexual assault. Some critics have mischaracterized its content as “soft pornography” or “political propaganda,” particularly in states like Missouri, Nebraska, and Florida. By 2021, accusations arose that Speak was anti-male and would encourage harmful behaviors, such as increasing abortion rates. Despite these challenges, Speak is ultimately about survivorship, giving voice to those silenced by trauma—particularly its protagonist, Melinda, who struggles to reclaim her identity after experiencing sexual assault. Far from being a political statement or anti-male, Anderson’s work is deeply personal, exploring the emotional aftermath of violence.

In 2019, Anderson took her fight against censorship to the next level by publishing Shout, a memoir that confronts issues of sexual assault, silencing, and the #MeToo movement head-on. While Shout takes place in a more contemporary social context, it shares many thematic similarities with Speak in its exploration of survivorship, trauma, and the power of breaking silence. Just like Speak, Shout has also faced challenges and bans, despite its relevance to ongoing cultural conversations about sexual violence and the imperative for survivors to speak up. Anderson’s choice to confront such difficult material in both novels reflects her dedication to challenging the culture of silence that so often surrounds sexual assault, especially in young adult literature. To this day, she is still fighting censorship, showing up at school boards, going on interviews such as NPR, and her own digital activism.

This Book is Banned_Search and Shout

“Soft Pornography” Accusation

 The argument that Speak promotes “soft pornography” primarily stems from the depiction of Melinda’s sexual assault. Some critics, particularly in conservative regions like Missouri and Nebraska, misinterpret the scene as inappropriate sexual content. However, this view fails to recognize the scene’s purpose: Speak portrays the trauma of the assault through Melinda’s perspective, focusing on her emotional and psychological aftermath rather than any graphic details. Anderson’s careful treatment of the subject focuses on the consequences of the violence, not the violence itself.

Fundamentally, literature is a space for discussing difficult but necessary topics, especially for young readers who may be experiencing similar trauma. Removing such books due to discomfort over subject matter can rob adolescents of an opportunity to find validation in their own experiences. Rather than exploitative, Speak presents the sexual assault as an integral part of Melinda’s journey to reclaim her voice and identity, making it more about recovery than shock value. Dismissing it as “pornography” silences important conversations about consent, trauma, and healing.

This Book is Banned_Speak and Shout

“Political Propaganda” Accusation

After 2021, as debates around Speak continued, another criticism surfaced—Speak was labeled “political propaganda,” with some accusing it of promoting anti-male sentiments. Critics claimed that the novel could lead to an increase in abortion rates or misrepresent men, framing them all as potential aggressors. This type of accusation stems from the novel’s critique of rape culture, which examines how societal norms perpetuate the silence around sexual violence. Rather than targeting men specifically, Speak focuses on the systems that allow violence to persist by silencing survivors, reinforcing that both men and women can play roles in supporting or dismantling these systems.

Far from being anti-male, Speak critiques systems of power that allow violence to flourish, and this critique is essential for all genders. Rape culture is a societal issue, not a gendered one. Both men and women can be affected by these harmful systems, and literature like Speak creates space for deeper conversations about how these structures work. Moreover, sexual assault affects all genders. For instance, studies show that 1 in 6 men have experienced sexual abuse or sexual assault. This statistic underscores that sexual violence is not solely a women’s issue. This makes Speak even more relevant for young readers who need to understand that survivorship is not limited to one gender.

This Book is Banned_Speak and Shout

Importance of Breaking the Silence

At its core, Anderson’s work, including her memoir Shout, is about breaking the silence surrounding sexual violence. Her anger over the continued silencing of survivors drove her to write Shout, published 20 years after Speak. Shout came out amid the rise of the #MeToo movement, founded by Tarana Burke in 2006 and gaining global attention in 2017, further highlighting the urgency of addressing sexual violence in society. Another study shows forty percent of rapes and sexual assaults were reported to police in 2017, but only about 25% were reported to police in 2018.” The book is a raw reflection of Anderson’s own experiences and frustrations with the lack of progress, adding a deeply personal dimension to the broader social critique.

While Speak fictionalizes Melinda’s experience, Shout serves as Anderson’s direct contribution to the #MeToo movement, amplifying survivors’ voices and advocating for accountability. The banning of these books—whether due to accusations of “political agendas” or “inappropriate content”—only reinforces the culture of silence that Anderson and #MeToo aim to dismantle.

In Conclusion

Laurie Halse Anderson’s Speak and Shout remain essential works for addressing sexual violence, despite accusations of being “soft pornography” or “political propaganda.” These claims distract from the novels’ fundamental purpose: to foster dialogue about survivorship, healing, and dismantling rape culture. Whether exploring Melinda’s fictionalized experience in Speak or Anderson’s own story in Shout, these books encourage readers to confront uncomfortable truths and break the silence that enables sexual violence to persist. Rather than banning these works, educators and readers alike should recognize their importance in creating empathy, awareness, and social change.

This is the fundamental reason I have written this essay. As a young male sexual assault survivor, when I encountered this book, I was able to learn that I wasn’t alone. As I read this book in middle school, I learned the vocabulary of what had happened to me. I had gotten sexually abused and assaulted, and it began a hard and arduous process of reconciling what had happened to me. I have to thank Melinda and Laurie Halse Anderson for this. I may have never been able to reclaim my voice, and start speaking if not for this book.

As book bans have drastically risen, Speak and Shout, are almost always on the list. Book banning, especially in the context of young adult literature, can have far-reaching consequences. By removing these books from schools and libraries, those most in need of support are denied access to stories that could help them process their own experiences. The very act of banning Speak reinforces the culture of silence that Anderson’s work seeks to dismantle.

This personal connection is why book bans are so damaging. For every survivor like me who found solace in Speak, there are countless others who might never have the chance if these books continue to be censored. The rise in book bans not only targets works about sexual assault but also restricts access to critical stories about race, gender, and identity. This wave of censorship disproportionately affects marginalized communities, whose stories are often deemed too controversial or political for public consumption. These works are vital not only for their literary merit but also for the crucial role they play in fostering empathy, understanding, and social change. As book bans continue to rise, it is more important than ever to defend the right to access literature that challenges the status quo and empowers survivors. Anderson’s work offers a powerful reminder that silence is not the solution—and that speaking out is an act of resistance and healing.

By banning these books, we are not protecting young readers; we are denying them the chance to learn, grow, and find the strength to reclaim their own voices.

Essayist bio:

David Win is an undergraduate student at Washington University in St. Louis, predominantly working in the non-profit and advocacy space. He states, “in this space I come as a survivor and book lover.”

See Below For Related Posts

Share This Post, Choose a Platform!

Images:

“Soft Pornography” Accusation: Photo by Adi Goldstein on Unsplash

“Political Propaganda” Accusation:  Photo by Andrea De Santis on Unsplash

Importance of Breaking the Silence:  Photo by Johannes Krupinski on Unsplash

Conclusion:  Photo by Egor Myznik on Unsplash




This Week’s Fun & Fancy Word: Macaronic!

fun and fancy word macaronic

This Week’s Fun & Fancy Word Is…

M
acaronic:

You might be expecting macaroons. If that’s the case, you’re gonna have to wait until after dinner. The word macaronic actually refers to when two different languages are mixed together like macaroni and cheese. Seriously. That’s the 15th-century origin of the word – maccarona, a type of dumpling or pasta eaten by peasants at that time.

An example of a macaronic language is Spanglish – with words like hangear [to hang out], lochear [to have lunch], marketa [a market or supermarket].[1] Is English the pasta and Spanish the cheese, or is it the other way around? Either way, it’s delicious.

Find A Caboodle
Of Fun & Fancy Words Here.




Aphorisms and Idioms: I Took the Road Less Traveled By…

the road not taken

T
he phrase “I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference,” is typically seen as an anthem of independence. These words have been borrowed for everything from high-school commencement speeches to product advertisements to episode titles of over a dozen television series. We’ve seen this verse printed on t-shirts, coffee mugs, and refrigerator magnets just to name a few.[1]

But the closing lines of Frost’s poem aren’t actually a paean of bold self-assertion and uniqueness. In fact, as is often the case with such aphorisms, it’s quite the opposite. One reason this happens is that, quite simply, language evolves. To further complicate matters, all too often the context of these popular wisdoms has been forgotten.

In the case of  “I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference,” the aphorism comes from a poem that is typically misinterpreted.

As Frost himself warned audiences, “you have to be careful of that one; it’s a tricky poem – very tricky.”[2] Even the person who inspired the poem didn’t “get it” at first. What, then, is Frost actually talking about?

the road not taken

What Inspired The Road Not Taken?

As with prose literature, when engaging poetry the author and their life experience comes into play.  Inspiration for The Road Not Taken came from Frost’s mirth over a personality trait of his closest friend in England, Edward Thomas.

While Frost was living in Gloucester, he and Thomas would take long walks through the countryside together. Repeatedly, Thomas would choose a route on the promise of showing his American friend rare wild-flowers or birds’ eggs, only to have the walk end in laments and self-reproach when his chosen path failed to produce any such marvels. Ribbing Thomas after one of their best flower-gathering walks, Frost chided, “No matter which road you take, you’ll always sigh, and wish you’d taken another.”[3]

After Frost returned to the U.S., where he finished The Road Not Taken, he sent a copy to Thomas. Frost’s expectation was that his friend would understand the poem as a joke, and respond with something along the lines of “very funny”…  “stop teasing me.” But as noted above, that isn’t what happened.

Instead, Thomas praised the poem, his remarks indicating he missed the joke. Much to Frost’s chagrin, he would have to explain to Thomas that he’d been the butt of a joke. And, not surprisingly, Thomas didn’t find it the least bit funny. Frost’s joke had pricked Thomas’ already wavering confidence.

None too pleased, Thomas declared he doubted anyone would see the poem as a joke unless they had Frost to personally guide them through it. Frost came to realize just how tricky The Road Not Taken is when he read it for a group of college students – who didn’t get it either. Frost ultimately extended a “Mea culpa” to his good friend.[4]

the road not taken

It’s a Tricky Poem… Very Tricky

A careful reading begins with Frost’s title. His poem isn’t called The Road Less Traveled, though it’s often mistaken to be. Rather, it is titled The Road Not Taken. So, the poem is definitely not about the road the narrator chose to walk, less-traveled or otherwise.

When The Road Not Taken is read carefully, it becomes apparent that the poem functions on a fluctuating rhythm, one that reflects indecisiveness. More significantly, it is evident that the narrator isn’t simply telling us about these vacillating perspectives, he’s experiencing these emotions in real time.

But, here’s where Frost’s trickiness can trip up a reader. Given the way Frost structured The Road Not Taken, when read superficially it can act as a verbal thaumatrope – rotating two opposed visions in such a way that they, deceivingly, seem to merge.

Much like the Victorian-era toy in which two objects drawn on opposite sides of a card – a bird and a cage for instance – are, by quick spinning motion, made to appear as a single image of the bird in a cage.[5] In the case of The Road Not Taken, the illusion is that the poem is from a consistent viewpoint rather than fluctuating perspectives.

But if we engage Frost’s work deeply, and take it line-by-line, we can see the shifts in perspective that lead to the more nuanced understanding Frost indicated.

the road not taken

Taking it Line by Line

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.[6]

Line 1: Frost introduces his primary symbol, diverging roads in the woods.

Lines 2-3: The speaker expresses regret for the human limitation that restricts his travel to one road, forcing him to choose between them. It’s clear that making a choice isn’t easy for him, since “long I stood” before reaching a decision.

Lines 4-5: He examines one road as well as he can, but information is limited because the road takes a turn into an area covered by low-lying vegetation.

Lines 6-8: At first blush, these lines seem to suggest the speaker finds the second path a more attractive choice because it appears no one had traversed it recently.

Lines 9-12: Here’s a tricky bit. The speaker backpedals, pointing out that this road is no more or less worn that the first one, that they both “equally lay in leaves no step had trodden black.”

Lines 13-15: Another slippery passage – the speaker tells himself he’ll take a walk on the first road another day. Given the exclamation point at the end of this line, he’s clearly excited about having solved his dilemma.  But, “knowing how way leads to way,” he immediately reverses himself, doubting if “I should ever come back.”

Lines 16-20: The tone clearly shifts here. The speaker is no longer in the moment. Rather, he imagines himself in the future, near the end of his days, talking about the life he’s lived. In perhaps the most subtle nugget of all, the speaker will be telling his audience that “Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.”

The “I—I” ever-so-deftly suggests a pause before the speaker recounts the story, as if he’s taking a beat to remember/decide how to characterize his choice.[7]

the road not taken

Psychologically Speaking

The Latin origin of the verb “to decide” means to cut off (de=off, caedere=cut). The act of deciding is supposed to cut off the deliberation process after a choice has been made. But psychologically, that isn’t the way it works. Instead, the deliberation process actually binds the options together in our memory, and the unchosen option lingers in our minds.

This psychological development leads to an inverse inference of value. In other words, after we realize the consequences of our decision, the perceived value of the unchosen option is inversely related to that outcome. And the stronger our memory is of deliberating between options, the greater the disparity between the value attributed to the chosen and unchosen options.

For example, if Frost’s speaker ended up having a lovely walk on the road he ultimately chose, he’ll remember the other road as having been inferior in some way even if it wasn’t.[8] This phenomenon is commonly referred to as confirmation bias.  And, it’s precisely what occurs in the closing lines of The Road Not Taken.

Remember, he told us both roads were equally fair and equally traveled. And don’t forget the speaker’s pause, as he mines his memory before recounting his story in the future. Plus, we end where we began our examination of The Road Not Taken, by noting that Frost’s title refers to the road his speaker didn’t choose.

So, rather than being an anthem of independence, Frost’s The Road Not Taken is an ode to the decision-making process, and how that activity effects memory. Albeit one that closes with an ironic jest, a witticism meaning – in the parlance of a modern quip – “and that has made all the difference”…  not.

Be Sure To Check Out More
Aphorisms And Idioms Here.

Share This Post, Choose a Platform!

Endnotes:

[1] Orr, David. “The Most Misread Poem in America.” September 11, 2015. The Paris Review.

[2] Thompson, Lawrance. Selected Letters of Robert Frost. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1952. Pg xv. https://ia801500.us.archive.org/15/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.111084/2015.111084.Selected-Letters-Of-Robert-Frost_text.pdf

[3] Thompson, Lawrance. Robert Frost: A biography. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1981. Pg 234.

Thompson, Lawrance. Selected Letters of Robert Frost. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1952. Pg xiv. https://ia801500.us.archive.org/15/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.111084/2015.111084.Selected-Letters-Of-Robert-Frost_text.pdf

Hollis, Matthew. “Edward Thomas, Robert Frost and the road to war.” July 26, 2011. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jul/29/robert-frost-edward-thomas-poetry

[4] Hollis, Matthew. “Edward Thomas, Robert Frost and the road to war.” July 26, 2011. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jul/29/robert-frost-edward-thomas-poetry

[5] Orr, David. “You’re Probably Misreading Robert Frost’s Most Famous Poem.” August 18, 2016. Literary Hub. https://lithub.com/youre-probably-misreading-robert-frosts-most-famous-poem/#:~:text=Because%20the%20poem%20isn’t,the%20road%20he%20never%20tried.

[6] Frost, Robert. “The Road Not Taken.” The Atlantic Magazine. August 1915, Pg. 223.

[7] “The Road Not Taken.” Encyclopedia.com https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/road-not-taken

[8] Natalie Biderman, and Daphna Shohamy. “Memory and decision making interact to shape the value of unchosen options.” Nature Communications. 12, 4648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24907-x

.

Images:

The Road Not Taken. iStock.com/credit: Alex

What Inspired The Road Not Taken? Boulter, Liz. “Roads taken: the Gloucrstershire footpaths that were the making of Robert Frost.” The Guardian. June, 2021.  https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2021/jun/14/walking-gloucestershire-footpaths-making-of-robert-frost-and-revolutionary-poets

It’a a Tricky Poem… Very Tricky  https://teacherswebresources.com/2016/03/28/victorian-thaumatrope/  

Taking it Line by Line Photo by Johnny Briggs on Unsplash

Psychologically Speaking  Photo by Yeshi Kangrang on Unsplash




Poetry For All: Where Poetry Comes Alive

poetry

P
oetry is as old as history itself. In fact, the earliest poetry predates the written word. According to some definitions, poetry is the primal and primary form of languages themselves.[1]

In oral traditions, poetry was a way of teaching historical information, recognizing family lineages, and handing down instructions for everyday activities… among other things.[2]

In a world with published textbooks, written genealogy records, and printed instruction manuals, poetry becomes a tool for self-reflection and self- expression.

It has the power to capture the essence of human experience. We can explore our deepest emotions through poetry, from joy and love to despair and grief. Robert Frost sums it up nicely:

Poetry is when an emotion has found its thought, and the thought has found words.[3]

Poetry not only allows us to reflect on our own experiences, it also enables us to connect with others who may have undergone similar situations. As cultural icon John Lennon pointed out:

My role in society, or any artist’s or poet’s role, is to try and express what we all feel. Not to tell people how to feel. Not as a preacher, not as a leader, but as a reflection of us all.[4]

You may ask, “can’t we also do that with prose?” The answer, of course, is yes. But, as playwright, novelist, and short story writer Somerset Maugham put it:

The crown of literature is poetry. It is its end and aim. It is the sublimest activity of the human mind. It is the achievement of beauty. The writer of prose can only step aside when the poet passes; he makes the best of us look like a piece of cheese.[5]

poetry

The Language
Of Poetry Is Unique

It often uses symbolism and metaphor to convey complex ideas in a succinct and impactful way. As Paul Engle observes:

Poetry is ordinary language raised to the Nth power. Poetry is boned with ideas, nerved and blooded with emotions, all held together by the delicate, tough skin of words.[6]

And, there’s an economy of language in poetry that differs from prose.[7] As poet Rita Dove points out:

Poetry is language is at its most distilled and most powerful.[8]

Then there’s the rhythm and sound of poetry. Which is evocative, drawing the reader in and immersing them in the language in a way that prose just doesn’t. T. S. Eliot hit the nail on the proverbial head when he observed that:

Genuine poetry can communicate before it is understood.[9]

And this may actually be part of the reason that, these days, poetry is all too often seen as either highfalutin and confounding, or filled with frivolous fluff.

poetry

To Have Great Poets,
There Must Be Great Audiences, Too

It was Walt Whitman who said “To have great poets, there must be great audiences, too.” [10]

But, given the mindset so many people have about poetry these days, how do we cultivate such an audience? Well… the podcast Poetry For All is a great place to start!

This podcast makes poetry leap from the page in accessible ways. Listeners are introduced to poems that enliven, challenge, transform, and enrich our lives by award-winning teachers.

In each episode, listeners are introduced to a poem, and shown how it works. The hosts teach out a sense of wonder and appreciation.  Guest presenters come from varying interests and very different worlds. And they learn from one another in each episode. In doing so, they open the world of poetry for anyone who wishes to explore it.

As Whitman’s nugget of wisdom suggests, and the Poetry For All website definitively states:

Poems are not finished until we read them. They crave conversation. They call for community. They live in the breath of each new reader and come alive in the exchanges they create.[11]

Poetry may seem like a solitary endeavor – that is, a single writer and a single reader. But, every poem written is actually in dialogue with poets beyond the one who wrote it. Every reader is also part of the discourse.

Whether you already love poetry or are just beginning to appreciate it, the Poetry For All podcast is the perfect way to experience poetry and join the conversation. You’ll “read a poem, discuss it, see what makes it tick, learn how it works, grow from it, and then read it one more time” – with a greater understanding than you had before.[12]

Here’s a list of episodes for your listening pleasure.
Jump into one that tickles your fancy.

poetry

And teachers…  Poetry For All
is a wonderful resource for you too.

See Below For Related Posts

poetry

Share This Post, Choose A Platform!

Endnotes:

[1] Nemerov, Howard. “Poetry.” Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/poetry

[2] Beissinger, M.H. (2012). “Oral poetry”. Princeton, NJ: The Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics. pp. 978–981.

Arsu, Sebnem (14 February 2006). “The oldest line in the world”. The New York Times.

[3] Donovan, Melissa. “Emotions and Poetry.” Writing Forward. https://www.writingforward.com/poetry-writing/quotes-on-writing-robert-frost-on-poetry

[4] John Lennon Quote. azquotes.com  https://www.azquotes.com/quote/172565?ref=poetry

[5] Maugham, Somerset. Cakes and Ale: or The Skeleton in the Cupboard. New York: Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc. 1930. Pg 358.

[6] AZquotes. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/529100?ref=poetry

[7] Majewski, Jessica. “Why Poetry Matters: The Significance of Poems in Our Lives.” When You Write. https://whenyouwrite.com/why-is-poetry-important/

[8] Rita Dove: ‘Poetry is language at its most distilled and most powerful.’” The Socratic Method. https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings-and-interpretations/rita-dove-poetry-is-language-at-its-most-distilled-and-most-powerful

[9] T. S. Eliot. “Genuine poetry can communicate before it is understood.” Dante. London: Faber & Faber, 1929. Pg 16.

Quotes of the Owl.com https://quotesoftheowl.com/genuine-poetry-can-communicate-before-it-is-understood-t-s-eliot/

[10] Whitman, Walt. Complete Prose Works, vol. III. Philadelphia: David McKay Publisher, 1892. Pg 324.

[11] Poetry For All. https://poetryforallpod.com/about/

[12] Poetry For All. https://poetryforallpod.com/

Images:

Where Poetry Comes Alive: Photo by Mona Eendra on Unsplash

The Language of Poetry:  Photo by Amador Loureiro on Unsplash

There Must Be Great Audiences, Too:  Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash