Book Bans: a case study in how to push back

book bans-push back

book bans push back.

early 1,500 individual books were banned in the first half of the 2022-2023 school year. That’s a 28 percent increase in book banning compared to the previous semester.[1]  During the 2021-2022 school year, book bans were issued across 32 states, effecting nearly four million students enrolled in at least 5,000 individual schools.[2]

What’s the best way to fight back? Activism revolving around Sandy Cisneros’ coming of age book The House on Mango Street is a veritable case study on successful pushback to book bans.

For example, the school board in St Helens, Oregon was “reconsidering” Cisneros’ work. Why was The House on Mango Street banned? Challengers cited “concerns for the social issues presented,” claiming it contains “content too mature for this age group.”[3]

How do you fight censorship in schools?

When Katie Van Winkle heard about what was taking place at her old school, she launched a grassroots letter-writing campaign on Facebook. Van Winkle enlisted former and current students to write testimonials about how they benefitted from reading The House on Mango Street as part of their middle school curriculum. The letters were subsequently presented at a school board meeting.

One former student referred to a class discussion about the scene where Esperanza is a victim of sexual assault.  This alumna reported that because the discourse took place in a safe and controlled environment, the conversation helped her cope with an attack she herself endured.

Social workers and counselors often use The House on Mango Street for young people who have been abused, physically, sexually, or otherwise. As Cisneros notes, “it allows them to talk about difficult subject matter without having to speak directly about themselves.”[4]

Students also pointed out in their testimonials that banning books which speak directly about social issues promotes silence – not only from victims of sexual assault, but those struggling with other real-world problems as well.

Thankfully, The House on Mango Street was reinstated to St. Helens’ middle school curriculum, a direct result of Van Winkle’s activism. But, as Van Winkle asserts, it should never have been removed in the first place:

This Book is Banned_Scarlet Alphabet

[Students] shouldn’t have to defend [their] right to learn about the world—the real world, not a protected world of make-believe that some adults want to present to students.[5]

Cisneros’ opinion about her work being banned? “Unless I make someone angry, I realize I’m not doing my job.[6]
.

What’s the most common reason for a book to be banned?

“Censorship,” as author Rudolfo Anaya states, “is fear clothed in the guise of righteousness.”[7] Shielding students from difficult realities doesn’t keep the world at bay. Sheltering children in this way may feel like their innocence is being protected. But doing so leaves them naïve and vulnerable, ill-prepared to navigate an often disturbing and sometimes dangerous world. Insulating students also makes them less resilient should they become a victim of such realities themselves.

The House on Mango Street was also among the books involved in a 2010 Arizona law specifically designed to ban the Mexican American studies program being taught in the Tucson Unified School District. Ironically, one of the reasons given for dismantling Tucson’s Mexican American studies program was that the curriculum “promote[s] resentment toward a race or class of people,” and “advocate[s] ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.” [8]

Challengers also allege that these books “promote the overthrow of the United States government.”[9] This charge is made despite, as author Tony Diaz points out, Cisneros’ protagonist Esperanza never saying a word about overthrowing the government. In fact, she doesn’t mention the government at all.[10]

Once again, students got involved and protested at a school district board meeting. National media got hold of the story, and so many people attended the next meeting that an overspill area was created, utilizing speakers so everyone could hear.[11]

Seeing these protests in the news, a group of Chicano writers, poets, artists and activists in Houston hatched a plan. They organized a caravan that traveled across the Southwest, spreading the word about what was going on in Arizona and gathering banned books to stock underground libraries in Tucson.[12]

The group called themselves librotraficante (which means book smuggler in Spanish) and rounded up more than 1,000 books by the time they reached their rally in Tucson.[13] The librotraficante not only handed out books to former Mexican American studies students, they created a library at a local youth center.

And it didn’t stop there. Further librotraficante actions include: social media campaigns, numerous freedom of speech events, and the launch of a magazine… not to mention the rise of underground libraries throughout the Southwest.

Following the success of the book-caravan, the group petitioned the Texas legislature for Mexican American studies to be offered statewide and got a positive response. The Texas State Board of Education agreed to allow interested schools to include ethnic-studies courses in their curriculum.[14]
.

How can book banning be stopped?

Ultimately, a federal judge struck down Arizona’s law banning the Mexican American studies program at Tucson High, finding that “both enactment and enforcement were motivated by racial animus.”[15] This was definitely a significant victory, but the librotraficante movement was never about a single win… so their activism continues.  The tiny program that Arizona tried to quietly shut down became the focal point of a Southwestern Chicano movement… and it was all kicked off by student involvement at a school board meeting.

The grassroots advocacy group MoveOn has taken a page from the librotraficante playbook. They recently launched a multi-state Banned Bookmobile Tour of their own. Like the librotraficante, they’re distributing some of the most frequently banned books in communities impacted by recent bans. Community involvement is clearly one of the most successful tools to push back with in the fight against book bans.

So, get involved.
Support your public library.
Attend your local school board meetings.

A single person can make a difference in the fight against book banning!
.

And, be sure to check out the post
The House on Mango Street: A bridge of unity.

#activism   #book banning     #The House on Mango Street

Endnotes:

[1] Kasey Meehan and Jonathan Friedman, Phd. “Banned in the USA: State Laws Supercharge Book Suppression in Schools.”  April 20, 2023. PEN America.  https://pen.org/report/banned-in-the-usa-state-laws-supercharge-book-suppression-in-schools/

[2 New Report: 2,500+ Book Bans Across 32 States During 2021-2022 School Year. September 19, 2022. PEN America 100. https://pen.org/press-release/new-report-2500-book-bans-across-32-states-during-2021-22-school-year/

[3] Van Winkle, Katie. “Saving Mango Street.” Rethinking Schools, v27 n1 p35-36 Fall 2012.  https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/saving-mango-street/

[4] Cisneros, Sandra. “The Author Responds to Your Letter.” In A House of My Own. New York: Penguin Random House, 2015. Pg 309.

[5] Van Winkle, Katie. “Saving Mango Street.” Rethinking Schools, v27 n1 p35-36 Fall 2012.  https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/saving-mango-street/

[6] “Sandra Cisneros.” In Interviews with writers of the post-colonial world. Edited by Jussawala, F., & Dasenbrock, R. W. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1992. Pg 292.

[7] Anaya, Rudolfo A. “Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry” in Censored Books, Critical Viewpoints. Edited by Nicholas J. Karolides, Lee Burress, and John M. Kean. (Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press, 2001). Pg 28.

[8] J. Weston Phippen and National Journal. “How One Law Banning Ethnic Studies Led to Its Rise.” July 19, 2015. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/how-one-law-banning-ethnic-studies-led-to-rise/398885/ ;
Hoinski, Michael. March 8, 2012. Texas Monthly via The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/09/us/gtt.html ;
Arizona House Bill 2281. https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/hb2281s.pdf

[9] Arizona House Bill 2281. https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/hb2281s.pdf

[10] Hoinski, Michael. March 8, 2012. Texas Monthly via The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/09/us/gtt.html

[11 J. Weston Phippen and National Journal. “How One Law Banning Ethnic Studies Led to Its Rise.” July 19, 2015. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/how-one-law-banning-ethnic-studies-led-to-rise/398885/

[12] J. Weston Phippen and National Journal. “How One Law Banning Ethnic Studies Led to Its Rise.” July 19, 2015. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/how-one-law-banning-ethnic-studies-led-to-rise/398885/ ;
Moreheart, Phil. “A Year in the Life of Librotraficante.” May 14, 2013. American Libraries Magazine. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2013/05/14/a-year-in-the-life-of-librotraficante/

[13] Moreheart, Phil. “A Year in the Life of Librotraficante.” May 14, 2013. American Libraries Magazine. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2013/05/14/a-year-in-the-life-of-librotraficante/

[14] J. Weston Phippen and National Journal. “How One Law Banning Ethnic Studies Led to Its Rise.” July 19, 2015. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/07/how-one-law-banning-ethnic-studies-led-to-rise/398885/
Moreheart, Phil. “A Year in the Life of Librotraficante.” May 14, 2013. American Libraries Magazine. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2013/05/14/a-year-in-the-life-of-librotraficante/
Librotraficante: Underground Libraries. http://www.librotraficante.com/Underground-Libraries.html

[15] Depenbrock, Julie. “Federal Judge Finds Racism Behind Arizona Law Banning Ethnic Studies.” August 22, 2017. NPR All Things Considered. https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017/08/22/545402866/federal-judge-finds-racism-behind-arizona-law-banning-ethnic-studies

Image:

Photo by Drew Coffman on Unsplash

FYI:

This Book is Banned participates in the Amazon.com affiliate program, where we earn a small commission by linking to books (but the price stays the same to you). This allows us to remain free, and ad free. [Our privacy policy]




Hispanic Heritage Month begins on September 15.

Banned Books Hispanic Heritage Month

This Book is Banned-Hispanic Heritage Month.
ispanic Heritage Month takes place every year from September 15th to October 15th. During that time, we celebrate the cultures, histories, and contributions of those whose ancestors came from Mexico, Spain, the Caribbean, as well as Central and South America.

September 15th is a significant date because it’s the anniversary of independence for the Latin American countries Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. With Mexico and Chile celebrating their independence days on September 16th and September 18th respectively.

Dia de la Raza, a day of struggle and vindication of the original peoples, also falls within this period – on October 12th. [1]

Celebrate with a selection from this list of banned books by Hispanic authors:

This book is Banned-One Hundred Years of Solitude

One Hundred Years of Solitude – by Gabriel García Márquez

This Nobel Prize winning work was published in 1967, and frequently challenged throughout the 1980s and 1990s due to coarse language and sexual content. In 1986, it was removed from required reading lists at Wasco Union (CA) High School by school officials who characterized the novel as “garbage being passed off as literature. Scholars widely consider this work to be a groundbreaking example of magic realism.

mexican white boy by matt de la pena

Mexican White Boy – by Matt de la Peña

Banned in Tucson, Arizona during their school system’s elimination of its Mexican American Studies Program. The author became known as an advocate for intellectual freedom. Though the Mexican American Studies Program was reinstated, this work remains relevant, given the recent targeting of books by and about the BIPOC (black, indigenous, people of color) community.

the house on mango street by sandra cisneros

.
The House on Mango Street
 
– by Sandra Cisneros

Cisneros’ work was a part of the same dismantled Mexican American Studies Program in Tucson that also involved Matt de la Peña. An Oregon school board also removed this book from its middle school curriculum in 2012 due to “concerns for the social images presented”. Fortunately, this decision was reversed following a student activism campaign. [2]

bless me ultima by rudolfo anaya

Bless Me, Ultima – by Rudolfo Anaya

Removed from a ninth grade English classroom in Norwood, Colorado during 2005, following parent complaints about profanity and “pagan content” (the title character is an herbal healer). Superintendent of schools, Bob Conder, confiscated two dozen copies of this novel and directed them to be destroyed. Students subsequently staged an all-day sit-in to protest the book’s removal. Conder later apologized, admitting he had never read the novel. [3]

how the garcia girls lost their accents by julia alvarez

.

How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents – by Julia Alvarez

One of 55 books that Parents Protecting the Minds of Children petitioned to have removed from Fayetteville, Arkansas school libraries in 2019. Objections include profane language and depictions of sexuality in many of the books.

the house of the spirits by isabel allende

.
The House of the Spirits
– by Isabel Allende

Challenged in 2013 at the Watauga County, N.C. High School due to the book’s graphic nature. After a five-month process and three appeal hearings, the book was fully retained. Allende’s work was named Best Novel of the Year in Chile in 1982, and she received the country’s Panorama Literario award.

This Book is Banned-Message to Aztlan

.

Message to Aztlán – by Rodolpho Gonzales.

Also included in the dismantling of Mexican American Studies (MAS) program in Tucson. Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal claimed the curriculum was “brainwashing” children into thinking Latinos have been victims of white oppression.

y no se lo trago la tierra

y no se lo tragó la tierra = and the earth did not devour him – by Tomás Rivera

Challenged with references to “a paragraph in the book full of offensive language,” this book contains themes of family life and tensions, getting an education, and growing up. This book was ultimately retained as part of the Clarke County, Ga. schools 2013 class reading list. [4]

Pick up one (or all) of these incredible books from your favorite bookseller.

And, be sure to check out our deep dive into Cisneros’ The House on Mango Street.

Endnotes:

[1] National Hispanic Heritage Month: Sept. 15-Oct. 15, 2023. United States Census Bureau.

Indigenous Resistance Day – Columbus Day – Meeting of two cultures. CNDH. (Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos)https://www.cndh.org.mx/noticia/dia-de-la-resistencia-indigena-dia-de-la-raza-encuentro-de-dos-culturas

[2] Rogers, Camille. “Banned Hispanic Heritage Books.” University of Maryland College of Information Studies.

[3] “Norwood Students Stage Sit-In to Protest Book Banning.” July 21, 2015. The Watch. https://www.telluridenews.com/the_watch/news/article_1ce8907e-5b90-5a73-8baa-10ad85648900.html

[4]“Libros Prohibidos – Banned Books by Latin Authors.”  Pima County Public Library.
https://pima.bibliocommons.com/list/share/328497117/505597407

Image:

Photo by Sydney Rae on Unsplash

FYI:

This Book is Banned participates in the Amazon.com affiliate program, where we earn a small commission by linking to books (but the price stays the same to you). This allows us to remain free, and ad free. [Our privacy policy]




2023 Library of Congress National Book Festival!

This Book is Banned-2023 LOC National Book Festival

This year’s theme is Everyone Has a Story,
celebrating the storyteller in us all. 

The 2023 Library of Congress National Book Festival takes place in Washington D.C. at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center on Saturday, August 12, from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. It’s free and open to the public.

This Book is Banned-2023 LOC National Book Festival

If you can’t attend in person, never fear, experience the LOC’s National Book Festival online. There are plenty of programs and activities available before (beginning July 20th), during, and continuing after the Festival.

In contrast to the book banners who target works advancing diversity, Rich Homberg, president and CEO of Detroit Public Television (which is partnering with the LOC in this event) asserted that “everyone has a story that needs to be told and we’re now living in an exciting time when more diverse voices are sharing their journeys, their rite of passage, as well as their challenges and opportunities, which are all preserved within the pages of books. That’s how we learn empathy, and that’s how we bridge great divides.”

Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden affirmed the sentiment, stating “the Library believes that everyone has a story to tell, and we’re proud to share the stories of so many groundbreaking authors, writers, poets and illustrators at the National Book Festival.”

The 2023 series features interviews with authors including Claribel A. Ortega, Shelby Van Pelt, Tananarive Due, S.A. Cosby, Luis Alberto Urrea, Beverly Gage, TJ Klune, Matthew Desmond, Héctor Tobar, Angeline Boulley and Trang Thanh Tran. You can find them at PBSbooks.org/LOCBookFest23

This Book is Banned-Library of Congress Interior

The Library of Congress is an amazing place, one you might not have thought of for personal use. But they have hundreds of incredible digital collections that include manuscripts from historic figures, newspaper archives, photographs, just to name a few…  not to mention the legislation we would expect them to house.

And then there’s our favorite, a source called banned books online –a listing of books that have been banned, complete with links to those books so we can be sure to read them. If you haven’t already discovered the Library of Congress, make the National Book Festival your first point of contact.

And then, be sure to tell us about the banned books
you were inspired to read as a result
.




Of Mice and Men: A Regular Greek Tragedy

Mice and Men banned

aybe Steinbeck’s dog Toby knew Of Mice and Men would become one of the most challenged books when he “made confetti” of the first draft.[1] Probably not. But even Steinbeck jokingly wondered whether the setter pup “may have been acting critically.”[2]

And indeed, Of Mice and Men consistently winds up on banned book lists. But, why is Of Mice and Men banned? Like a lot of banned books, Of Mice and Men is frequently challenged for “profanity,” and “offensive language.”[3] It’s been banned for similar reasons somewhere in the United States for decades.

Challenges in the 1970s came from (among other places) Oil City, Pennsylvania; Syracuse, Indiana; and Grand Blanc, Michigan. In 1983, the chair of the Knoxville, Tennessee school board vowed to eradicate all “filthy books” from the local school system, beginning with Of Mice and Men.[4] An Iowa City, Iowa parent challenged the book in 1991 because she didn’t want her daughter to “talk like a migrant worker” when she finished school.[5] And, it was still among the top ten most challenged books in 2020.[6]

Bannings for vulgarity continue. But, why has Of Mice and Men become so controversial? More recent challenges to Steinbeck’s novella include “racist language.”[7] Contemporary objections also involve statements that are “defamatory” to women and the disabled.[8]

Set in California during the Great Depression, Of Mice and Men has also been challenged because it contains “morbid and depressing themes.”[9] A 2015 challenger found it “too ‘negative,’ and ‘dark,’” further stating that the work “is neither a quality story nor a page turner.”[10] Not surprisingly, I beg to differ.

As challenges for “negativity” and “depressing themes” suggest, some people clearly consider literature’s function to be serving up “vicarious ‘happy endings,’” to sugar coat the hard truths of real life.[11] The best writers and readers, however, understand that literature can also be strong medicine – bitter perhaps, but necessary to continued social and emotional health.[12] Needless to say, Of Mice and Men is a dose of this medicine.

“In every bit of honest writing in the world,” Steinbeck noted, “there is a base theme. Try to understand [people], if you understand each other you will be kind to each other.”[13] This sentiment not only underscores concepts addressed elsewhere on this site, more importantly it’s the polar opposite of the thinking behind concerted efforts to ban books that promote diversity.

Steinbeck described his “whole work drive” as being aimed at “making people understand each other.”[14]  And, the understanding engendered by Steinbeck’s novella runs deep, which makes it a perfect example of how novels are like a layer cake. By that I mean it contains several levels of meaning and perspectives of interpretation.

Of Mice and Men addresses the human condition on the social/historical level, the mythological level, as well as through a psychological filter. In fact, Steinbeck’s book has so much to offer that this essay will be posted in three segments.  Let’s dig into the first installment.

Mice and Men banned

It’s a Regular Greek Tragedy.

It all begins with why Of Mice and Men is called Of Mice and Men. Steinbeck’s novella is named for a line in Robert Burns’ 1785 poem To a Mouse, On Turning Her Up In Her Nest With The Plough. The mouse in Burns’ poem embodies the all-too-often futile hope, and fruitless planning that earthly creatures put into the future. Like most Tragic figures, Burns’ mouse is a tangible expression of the fear and misery a being experiences when compelled to vie with forces incomprehensibly bigger than itself.[15]

This Book is Banned_Scarlet Alphabet But Mousie, thou art no thy-lane,
In proving foresight may be vain
The best laid schemes o’ Mice and Men
Gang aft agley,
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promis’d joy!
(lines 36-41)
But mouse-friend, you are not along
in proving foresight may be vain:
The best-laid schemes of Mice and Men
Go oft awry,
And leave us only grief and pain,
For promised joy!  [16]


Steinbeck signals from the outset of his novella that mice signify inevitable failure. George is described in mouse-like terms, as “small and quick, dark of face, with restless eyes and sharp, strong features.”[17] And Lennie keeps a dead mouse in his pocket. Lennie carries a mouse in his pocket because he loves to pet soft, furry things. But despite how much he cares for them (or perhaps because he cares so much), no matter how hard he tries Lennie just can’t control his incredible strength, and inevitably kills them by handling them too roughly.[18]

As noted above, one reason Of Mice and Men has “evoked controversy and censorious action” is because it’s “painful” to read.[19] And, I don’t mean that it’s difficult to understand. It hurts to read Of Mice and Men. And that’s because it’s a Tragedy, in the “classic Aristotelian/Shakespearean sense.”[20] Bearing that in mind, it’s very telling that Steinbeck wrote Of Mice and Men in an experimental form he called a “playable novel,” a novel that could be “played from the lines, or a play that could be read.”[21]

It isn’t only that the work’s form parallels that of Tragedy. Of Mice and Men is consistent with Tragedy’s emphasis on plot that revolve around conflicts between opposing if not irreconcilable impulses: mortals and gods for example, law and nature, or individuals and states. And, needless to say, tragedies never end well. The narrative typically culminates in the degradation or destruction of a key individual, coalition, or society.

Though early tragedies were often set in the mythic past, they were purposely (albeit indirectly) intended to promote public debate about current interests and the contemporary condition of the state.  In short, for the Greeks tragedies were a form of public education. They were meant to horrify and admonish the citizenry.  By shocking and unsettling the audience, tragedies forced discussions of what needed to happen in order to avoid such a fate.  So, they weren’t advocating resignation, or conveying a fatalistic message. Tragedies were intended to serve as a warning, and function as a call to action.[22]

Consistent with early tragedies, Of Mice and Men shows “humanity’s achievement of greatness through and in spite of defeat.”[23] Steinbeck’s novella, however, contains a deceptively simple dramatic structure, one lacking in the grandiose gestures typically associated with the tragic form. The work’s structure may make it readily adaptable to the stage, but there’s no grand design. There are no heroes, or villains in the traditional, Aristotelian sense.[24] As Steinbeck’s working title, Something That Happened, aptly suggests, events in the story simply occur.[25]

But that doesn’t mean Steinbeck’s underlying message is simply that’s the way the cookie crumbles. Though Of Mice and Men is less blatantly a social novel than Grapes of Wrath or In Dubious Battle (Steinbeck’s strike novel), it addresses the elusiveness of the American Dream. It also comments on the false hope of economic prosperity that is frequently dangled in front of middle and lower classes. And Lennie, as Steinbeck specifically states, represents “the inarticulate and powerful yearning of all men” (rather than the “insanity” he is typically associated with).[26]

Mice and Men banned

The Wall of Background Behind Of Mice and Men

Though he doesn’t explicitly indicate the historical or social context of his novella, Steinbeck refers to a “wall of background” behind Of Mice and Men.[27] Following the Civil War, a large floating labor class developed in the United States. And, according to a 1917 survey of national labor conditions, “probably no more striking example of extremely seasonal industries exist[ed] than in California.”[28] The report also claims that “the seasonal irregularity of employment [was] so great that there [had] grown up a large class of migratory homeless laborers.”[29] A source associated with the Federal Industrial Relations Commissions indicated that “there is a migratory class of labor in California because there must be. Without them the industries on which California’s fame depends could not exist.”[30]

The conventional wisdom of the day maintained that personal choice was the reason itinerants were on the road. And, that personal failing lead to a life of transience and temporary work. Though noted labor researcher Frederick C. Mills didn’t disregard this factor, he concluded that the “whip of economic necessity” was the primary reason for the existence of the large itinerant class in the state. In Mills’ words (from a 1914 journal he kept while investigating working conditions in California’s Central Valley disguised as a migrant worker), “the constitution of California industry demands an immense reserve labor force of migratory, seasonal workers.”[31]

Farmworkers’ wages were exceedingly low. The living quarters supplied with employment were squalid. And, advancement opportunities were all but non-existent. Even the most ambitious and determined worker typically met with failure, and took to roving out of necessity. Being a farmworker was to be among California’s disenfranchised, a degraded, powerless, and ill-paid fraternity.[32]

Like the “bindle-stiffs” Steinbeck himself worked with “for quite a spell,” George and Lennie never get the little piece of land they keep talking about.[33] And Crooks, the black stablebuck on the ranch, comments on how George and Lennie are just like all the other workers he sees coming through:

This Book is Banned_Scarlet AlphabetI seen hunderds of men come by on the road an’ on the ranches, with their bindles on their back an’ that same damn thing in their heads. Hunderds of them. They come, an’ they quit an’ go on; an’ every damn one of ‘em’s got a little piece of land in his head. An’ never a God damn one of ‘em ever gets it. Just like heaven. Ever’body wants a little piece of lan’. I read plenty of books out here. Nobody never gets to heaven, and nobody gets no land. It’s just in their head. They’re all the time talkin’ about it, but it’s jus’ in their head.   [34]

The idea of owning a little piece of land has taken root in many workers’ heads, but according to Crooks, none of them ever achieves that dream.

Crooks himself embodies another stone in Steinbeck’s “wall of background.” He’s a living reminder of America’s slave-holding economy. Crooks’ twisted back is evidence of the human cost associated with that economy. In case we miss this message, Steinbeck drives his point home with rattling halter chains.[35]

Then there’s Crooks’ living quarters. Not wanted in the bunkhouse, Crooks’ room is separate from the other men. And to drive Steinbeck’s point home once again, there’s a manure pile directly under the window. It’s a striking and powerful depiction of racism – which, needless to say, is a byproduct of the slave-holding economy we continue to grapple with.[36]

Curley’s nameless wife is also defined as property. She’s described (as being heavily made up and wearing red mules adorned with ostrich feathers), but is only ever referred to as “Curley’s wife.”[37] She’s lumped together with the most powerless of the workers, the other chattel of the ranch. So, it’s no coincidence that she’s the one who spells out Lennie’s value within this economic structure, when she calls him a “Machine.”[38]

Mice and Men banned

The Potential for Tragic Nobility Isn’t Limited to Kings.

Steinbeck’s blunt approach and rough language, which consistently gets Of Mice and Men banned, are part of his precise reporting of this reality, of this particular time, place, and environment. The point being… this is true to life. “For too long,” Steinbeck wrote to his godmother in 1939, “the language of books was different from the language of men. To the men I write about profanity is adornment and ornament, and is never vulgar and I try to write it so.”[39]

These “dirty details” democratize the realm of Tragedy. Tragedies have traditionally revolved around Kings and other “Great Ones,” (such as Oedipus, or Job). But, Steinbeck makes the very American point that all men are created equal, that Tragedy exists even among the lowly. Even a George, or a Lennie, has the potential for tragic nobility.[40]

As Steinbeck points out in a 1938 issue of Stage magazine:

This Book is Banned_Scarlet AlphabetOf Mice and Men may seem to be unrelieved tragedy, but it is not. A careful reading will show that while the audience knows, against its hopes, that the dream (of Lennie’s) will not come true, the protagonists must, during the play [book] become convinced that it will come true. Everyone in the world has a dream he knows can’t come off but he spends his life hoping it may. This is at once sadness, the greatness, and the triumph of our species. And this belief on stage [within the novella] must go from skepticism to possibility to probability before it is nipped off by whatever the modern word for fate is. And in hopelessness – George is able to rise to greatness – to kill his friend to save him. George is a hero and only heroes are worth writing about. [41]

So, George is a modernist Hero. He’s the little man, who makes the only gesture of control at his disposal, and sacrifices what he’ll lose anyway.[42]

Mice and Men banned

Walk a Mile in the Shoes of the Powerless

Steinbeck, as noted earlier, believed that honest literature was about trying to understand our fellow human beings, “what makes them up, and what keeps them going.”[43] And, Of Mice and Men, like all good literature, evokes empathy in the reader. By depicting the lived realities of the economies he examines and their resultant classicism, racism, and sexism – in admittedly ugly but candid terms –  he encourages us to walk a mile (as the saying goes) in the shoes of those shaped by the conditions of these economic structures.

Through his characters, Steinbeck appeals to the reader to feel these workers’ desperation and bitter loneliness. He invites us to recognize their dreams of a better life. And he admonishes us to not only consider the real-world moral issues embodied in his characters’ experience, but to confront them.

In Conclusion

As pointed out in several places on This Book is Banned, literature shines a light on societal ills. Like the Tragedies of Ancient Greece, contemporary literature urges us to rethink and improve the world we live in. This social/historical layer within Of Mice and Men shines a light on the social issues engendered by an economic structure that creates and benefits from a class of disenfranchised workers. That’s the condition of the state Steinbeck’s Tragedy warns us about.  Consistent with the Ancient Tragedies, Steinbeck writes in the hope of inspiring public debate, and a call to action for society to self-correct.

That’s my take on John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men– what’s yours?
Check out this Discussion Guide to get you started.

Page Capper copy

Endnotes:

[1] Gannett, Lewis. “John Steinbeck: Novelist at Work.” The Atlantic Monthly. (December 1945), 58.
[2] Gannett, 58.
[3] “Banned: Of Mice and Men.” American Experience. www.pbs.org ; ALA. “Top 10 Most Challenged Books Lists.” (Of Mice and Men banned).
[4] Sova, 239.
[5] Sova, 239.
[6] ALA. “Top 10 Most Challenged Books of 2020.” Banned & Challenged Books: A Website of the ALA Office for Intellectual (Of Mice and Men banned). Freedom. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10
[7] ALA. “Banned & Challenged Classics.” Banned & Challenged Books: A Website of the ALA Office for Intellectual (Of Mice and Men banned). Freedom. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/classics
[8] ALA. “Banned & Challenged Classics.” (Of Mice and Men banned).
[9]ALA. “Banned & Challenged Classics.”  (Of Mice and Men banned).
[10] Schaub, Michael. “John Steinbeck’s ‘Of Mice and Men’ survives censorship attempt in Idaho.” Los Angeles Times. (June 2, 2015).
[11] Scarseth, Thomas. “A Teachable Good Book: ‘Of Mice and Men.’” In Censored Books: Critical Viewpoints. (Pp 388- 394.) Edited by Nicholas J. Karolides et al. (Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2001), 388.
[12] Scarseth, 388.
[13] Shillinglaw, Susan. “Introduction.” Of Mice and Men. (New York: Penguin Books, 1994), 6.
[14] Gannett, 59.
[15] Reinking, Brian. “Robert Burns’s Mouse In Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men and Miller’s Death of a Salesman.” The Arthur Miller Journal. Vol. 8, Number 1 (Spring 2013), 15, 21.
[16] Burch, Michael R. “Robert Burns: Modern English Translations and Original Poems, Songs, Quotes, Epigrams and Bio.” The HyperTexts. 
http://www.thehypertexts.com/robert%20burns%20translations%20modern%20english.htm
[17] Steinbeck, John. “Of Mice and Men.” The Portable Steinbeck. (New York: Penguin Books, 1981), 228.
[18] Lisca, Peter. The Wide World of John Steinbeck. (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1981), 136.
[19] Scarseth, Thomas. “A Teachable Good Book: ‘Of Mice and Men.’” In Censored Books: Critical Viewpoints. (Pp 388-394) Edited by Nicholas J. Karolides et al. (Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2002), 388.
[20] Scarseth, 388.
[21] Steinbeck, John. Stage Magazine, January 1938.
[22] Brands, Hal & Charles Edel. The Lessons of Tragedy: Statecraft and World Order. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 8-10.
[23] Scarseth, 388.
[24] Doyle, Brian Leahy. “Tragedy and the Non-teleological in ‘Of Mice and Men.’” The Steinbeck Review. Vol. 3, Number 2 (Fall 2006), 81.
[25] Parini, Jay. “Of Bindlestiffs, Bad Times, Mice and Men.” New York Times. September 27, 1992.
[26] Gannett, Lewis. “John Steinbeck: Novelist at Work.” The Atlantic Monthly. (December 1945), 58.
[27] Heavilin, Barbara A. “’The wall of background’: Cultural, Political, and Literary Contexts of Steinbeck’s ‘Of Mice and Men.’” The Steinbeck Review. Vol. 15, Number 1, 2018, (pp. 1-16), 1.
[28] Woirol, Gregory R. “Men on the Road: Early Twentieth-Century Surveys of Itinerant Labor in California.” California History. Vol. 70, No. 2 (Summer 1991), 192.
[29] Woirol, 192.
[30] Fitch, John A. “Old and New Labor Problems in California.” The Survey. Volume 32, April 1914 – September 1914), 610.
[31] Woirol, Gregory R. “Men on the Road: Early Twentieth-Century Surveys of Itinerant Labor in California.” California History. Vol. 70, No. 2 (Summer 1991), 198; Mills, Frederick C. “The Hobo and the Migratory Casual on the Road.” Mills, Frederick C. Mills papers, AA.
[32] Shillinglaw, Susan. “Introduction.” Of Mice and Men. (New York: Penguin, 1998), 9.
[33] Parini, Jay. “Of Bindlestiffs, Bad Times, Mice and Men.” New York Times. September 27, 1992.
[34] Steinbeck, “Of Mice and Men,” 293.
[35] Owens, Louis. “Deadly Kids, Stinking Dogs, and Heroes: The Best Laid Plans in Steinbeck’s ‘Of Mice and Men.’” Western American Literature. Vol. 37, No. 3 (Fall 2002), 325.
[36] Hart, Richard E. “Moral Experience in ‘Of Mice and Men’: Challenges and Reflections.” The Steinbeck Review. Vol. 1, No. 2 (Fall 2004), 40.
[37] Steinbeck Of Mice and Men, 254.
[38] Steinbeck Of Mice and Men, 298; Owens, Louis. “Deadly Kids, Stinking Dogs, and Heroes: The Best Laid Plans in Steinbeck’s ‘Of Mice and Men.’” Western American Literature. Vol. 37, No. 3 (Fall 2002), 325.
[39] Scarseth, 389; Shillinglaw, 19.
[40] Scarseth, 389.
[41] John Steinbeck. Stage. January 1938.
[42] Owens “Deadly Kids,” 322.
[43] Hart, 40.

Images:

First-edition dust jacket cover of Of Mice and Men (1937). Illustrated by Ross MacDonald. Published by Covici-Friede. – Scan via Heritage Auctions Lot #36344. Cropped from the original image and lightly retouched., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=91868578

It’s a Regular Greek Tragedy. Dionysus mask. Louvre Museum, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dionysos_mask_Louvre_Myr347.jpg

The Wall of Background Behind Of Mice and Men:
Lange, Dorothea, photographer. On U.S. 101 near San Luis Obispo, California. Itinerant worker. Not the old “Bindle-Stiff” type. United States San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo County California, 1939. Feb. Photograph. https://www.loc.gov/item/2017771237/

The Potential for Tragic Nobility Isn’t Limited to Kings:
Lange, Dorothea, photographer. Migrant agricultural worker. Near Holtville, California. Imperial County California Holtville United States, 1937. Feb. Photograph. https://www.loc.gov/item/2017769658/.

Walk a Mile in the Shoes of the Powerless. Lange, Dorothea, photographer. Migrant agricultural workers, idle in town during the potato harvest. Shafter, California. United States Kern County California Shafter, 1938. June. Photograph. Public Domain via Library of Congress. . https://www.loc.gov/item/2017770608/.

FYI:

This Book is Banned participates in the Amazon.com affiliate program, where we earn a small commission by linking to books (but the price stays the same to you). This allows us to remain free, and ad free. [Our privacy policy]




Of Mice and Men Discussion Guide – A few conversation starters

This Book is Banned_Of Mice and Men - Discussion Guide

Use this discussion guide to inspire in-depth thinking, and jump-start a conversation about John Steinbeck’s novella Of Mice and Men. There’s plenty here to set your mental wheels in motion.

  1. What is the meaning of the novella’s title?
    .
  2. It’s often said that the mouse in the Robert Burns poem that gives Of Mice and Men its name, represents the fear and misery a being experiences when contending with forces incomprehensibly larger than themselves. What are the forces George and Lennie are grappling with? And why does realizing this help us understand our fellow man?
    .
  3. What does Curley’s wife mean when she refers to Lennie, Crooks and Candy as bindle stiffs? And what does that tell us about the life of California farm workers during this period in history?
    .
  4. In a psychological reading of Steinbeck’s novella, why is the setting significant? What is symbolized by starting Of Mice and Men in a deeply wooded river scene?
    .
  5. What do the events surrounding Candy’s dog indicate about the life of itinerant laborers in the industry Steinbeck is addressing? And why does Candy come to feel he should have shot his dog himself?
    .
  6. While it’s true that much of Steinbeck’s fiction is realistic and informed by firsthand events, he transforms those encounters into a thematic or spiritual experience common to humankind. What is a common human experience that Of Mice and Men addresses?
    .
  7. Why is the story of George and Lennie’s dream farm recited repeatedly?
    .
  8. Why is Lennie obsessed with keeping rabbits on the farm he and George dream of owning?  Their vision also includes a chicken run, a few pigs, and maybe a cow or a goat. What is symbolically significant about rabbits – think Bugs Bunny, the Br’er Rabbit of African American folklore, or Alice in Wonderland’s White Rabbit – and why is that relevant here?
Page Capper copy

#John Steinbeck     #banned     #social commentary     #published 1930s




Berlin’s Third Gender: targeted in the first Nazi book burning.

LGBTQ targeted in book burning

oday is the anniversary of the Stonewall Uprising, a series of events in 1969 that has shaped the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. The significance of that moment in history is undeniable. Stonewall brought a heightened level of awareness of and participation in LGBTQ+ activism. In fact, it’s the reason June is Pride month.

Especially on this day it’s important to remember that, as professor of queer literary studies Octavio González points out, Stonewall is a “development in a longer arc of queer-rights advocacy, research, and activism.”[1]  And that arc begins with the world’s first gay activist group, established in 1897 by Magnus Hirschfeld, author of the foundational text of queer identity Berlin’s Third Gender.[2]

LGBTQ targeted in book burning

Who’s Magnus Hirschfeld? He was a German physician and sexologist, best known for being an outspoken advocate for sexual minorities. Hirschfeld saw sexual orientation as a naturally occurring trait, one deserving of scientific inquiry and political emancipation rather than societal hostility.[7]

His motto was per scientiam ad justitiam (through science to justice), which epitomizes his conviction that scientific understanding of sexuality would result in tolerance and acceptance of sexual minorities.[8]

As noted above, Hirschfeld established the world’s first gay activist group, the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee. The organization’s primary goal was overturning Paragraph 175 of the German Criminal Code, which targeted homosexual men. As a gay man, this section of Germany’s penal code dogged Hirschfeld’s own existence.

Through his medical practice, he also saw the devastating impact it had on men who lived in fear and shame, prey to blackmailers. The organization’s charter also called for public enlightenment about sexual minorities.

LGBTQ targeted in book burning

The Yearbook for Sexual Intermediaries, published in 1899, was the first text produced toward that end by Hirschfeld’s Scientific-Humanitarian Committee. It appeared in annual editions for a quarter of a century, and totaled 11,000 pages. The Yearbook is academic in nature, and forthrightly maintains that homosexuality is in-born. It also tracks the development of a corresponding homosexual identity throughout history.

LGBTQ targeted in book burning

In 1904, Hirschfeld published the essay titled The Third Gender and it’s the first published work on the subject from an insider’s perspective.[9] The phrase “the third gender” is a label of convenience utilized in ancient Rome, coming from a time when he was still examining the distinction between gender and sexuality.[10]

In his research on sexual attraction, Hirschfeld landed on the idea of a continuum – decades before Alfred Kinsey entered the picture.[11] He specified that being at either end of the heterosexual/homosexual spectrum was the exception rather than the rule. Hirschfeld also noted that these proportions were likely to change over the course of one’s lifetime.[12]

Much of The Third Gender revolves around expressions of same-sex attraction, but it also addresses those living in conflict with their assigned gender (who would come to be identified as trans). Hirschfeld realized that denying their identity was driving these individuals to depression or even suicide. At the time, a term describing their circumstances didn’t exist. In fact, it was Hirschfeld who coined the term transsexualism, giving a name and therefore credence to their situation. His most powerful contribution to the transexual community, however, (even above the clinical assistance he offered) was acknowledging that trans men and women exist… and always have.

In contrast to the Yearbook for Sexual intermediaries’ academic tone, there’s little evidence of Hirschfeld’s extensive research into sexual practices in The Third Gender. The focus is reversed, from exoticism to familiarity, with same-sex subjects presented in commonplace domestic settings. It’s also markedly sentimental, which makes it more accessible to the average reader.[13] For example:

This Book is Banned_Scarlet AlphabetI was once treating a noble lady who had been living with a friend for a number of years for a serious nervous condition. Neither before nor since have I seen such a loving merging of a healthy person into a sick person in my practice as in this case, neither among spouses nor even among mothers who feared for their children. The healthy friend was not a pleasant fellow citizen, she had a lot of ruthless and headstrong attitudes, but anyone who saw this truly touching love and care, this unremitting effort day and night, held much too good for her for the sake of this strong and beautiful feeling. She was really bonded to her friend, if you touched a painful limb of the patient, she winced reflexively, every discomfort of the sufferer was reflected on her face.  [14]

This Book is Banned_Scarlet AlphabetSome think of their dashed hopes, what could they have achieved if old prejudices had not stood in the way of their careers, and others in respected positions remember the lie of life that weighs heavily on them! Many think of their parents who are dead or for whom they are dead, and all of them with heartfelt melancholy of the woman who loved them more than anything and whom they loved more than anything—their mother. [15]

1919 saw Hirschfeld open the world’s first institute for sexual science, which he located in Berlin. It is there that he established a vocabulary for sexual minorities, which helps to remove the stigma and taboo they’d been experiencing. It’s also here that he offered practical interventions like hair removal, hormone treatment, and pioneering gender affirmation surgery.[16]

After more than a decade, Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Sciences housed an extensive library on sexuality, it included rare books, as well as diagrams and protocols for transition surgery.

LGBTQ targeted in book burning

It was on May 6, 1933 that the Nazis came for the institute. Troops swarmed the building, and carried off all its books, which they piled in the street along with a bronze bust of Hirschfeld. The bonfire engulfed more than 20,000 books, filled with research that not only helped establish a historical context for non-conforming people but also delineated procedures that addressed their physical needs.[17]  

Needless to say, the collection was irreplaceable. And as a result of the burning, the acknowledgement and therefore acceptance of sexual minorities was significantly hindered across the globe.

And it isn’t only the LGBTQ+ community that’s effected. Hobbling opportunities to understand one another is detrimental to all of us.  That’s why it is more important than ever to not just talk about the banning of books, but to take action.

What kind of action? Check out a banned book from the library – yes, that actually helps. And, public input is important, so contact your local school board members, library trustees, and state legislators. Better yet, attend the next school board or library board meeting and speak out against book bans. It’s also a pretty good way to commemorate Stonewall’s anniversary.

Page Capper copy

#StonewallAnniversary     #Berlin’sThirdGender     #MagnusHirschfeld        #LGBTQ+ authors

Endnotes:

[1] “On the 50th Anniversary of Stonewall, Wellesley Professor Discusses Its Legacy and Impact.” Wellesley College. https://www.wellesley.edu/news/2019/stories/node/167031

[2] Conway, James J. “Out on the Town: Magnus Hirschfeld and Berlin’s Third Sex.” June 7, 2022. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/out-on-the-town?fbclid=IwAR0EdZNI7FNZ3ciu7wBCCIEOB8WCBc3FglAVjBJF7ZJ5fOrGT9U3v-3AVBM#p-1-1

[3] Kasey Meehan, Jonathan Friedman. “Banned in the USA: State Laws Supercharge Book Suppression in Schools.” April 20, 2023. PEN America.https://pen.org/report/banned-in-the-usa-state-laws-supercharge-book-suppression-in-schools/

[4] Hillel Italie. “’Gender Queer’ tops library group’s list of challenged books.” AP News. https://apnews.com/article/most-challenged-books-2022-list-c39af4320afb16525cb0fd911c9ffed4

[5] Padgett, Donald. “Burn LGBTQ+ Books for Children, Group of Mothers Demands Local Library.” July 11, 2022. The Advocate. https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/11/burn-lgbtq-books-children-group-mothers-demands-local-library

[6] Bauer, Heike. “Burning Sexual Subjects: Books, Homophobia and the Nazi Destruction of the Institute of Sexual Sciences in Berlin.” In Book Destruction, ed. Gill Partington and Adam Smyth (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 17-33.

[7] Melville, Raymond. “Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld.” Stonewall Society. https://www.stonewallsociety.com/famouspeople/magnus.htm

[8] Bauer, Edgar J. “Hirschfelt, Magnus.” GLBTQ Historical Society. http://www.glbtqarchive.com/ssh/hirschfeld_m_S.pdf

[9] Conway, James J. “Out on the Town: Magnus Hirschfeld and Berlin’s Third Sex.” June 7, 2022. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/out-on-the-town?fbclid=IwAR0EdZNI7FNZ3ciu7wBCCIEOB8WCBc3FglAVjBJF7ZJ5fOrGT9U3v-3AVBM#p-1-1

[10] Hirschfeld, Magnus. The Third Gender. 7th edition. Edited by Hans Ostwald. Berlin: Hermann Seemann, Pg 6.

[11] Conway, James J. “Out on the Town: Magnus Hirschfeld and Berlin’s Third Sex.” June 7, 2022. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/out-on-the-town?fbclid=IwAR0EdZNI7FNZ3ciu7wBCCIEOB8WCBc3FglAVjBJF7ZJ5fOrGT9U3v-3AVBM#p-1-1

[12] “Hirschfeld, Magnus” in Encyclopedia of Gender and Society (vol 1) edited by Jodi O’Brien. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2009. Pg 424.

[13] Conway, James J. “Out on the Town: Magnus Hirschfeld and Berlin’s Third Sex.” June 7, 2022. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/out-on-the-town?fbclid=IwAR0EdZNI7FNZ3ciu7wBCCIEOB8WCBc3FglAVjBJF7ZJ5fOrGT9U3v-3AVBM#p-1-1

[14] Hirschfeld, Magnus. The Third Gender. 7th edition. Edited by Hans Ostwald. Berlin: Hermann Seemann, Pg 14.

[15] Hirschfeld, Magnus. The Third Gender. 7th edition. Edited by Hans Ostwald. Berlin: Hermann Seemann, Pg 19.

[16] Conway, James J. “Out on the Town: Magnus Hirschfeld and Berlin’s Third Sex.” June 7, 2022. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/out-on-the-town?fbclid=IwAR0EdZNI7FNZ3ciu7wBCCIEOB8WCBc3FglAVjBJF7ZJ5fOrGT9U3v-3AVBM#p-1-1

[17] Schillace, Brandy. “The Forgotten History of the World’s First Trans Clinic.” May 10, 2021. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-forgotten-history-of-the-worlds-first-trans-clinic/

Images:

“6 May 1933: Looting of the Institute of Sexology.” Holocaust Memorial Day Trust.”

Magnus Hirschfeld. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Magnus-Hirschfeld#/media/1/266859/245720

Yearbook for sexual intermediates with special reference to homosexuality. Edited by Magnus Hirschfeld. Leipzig: Publisher of Max Spohr 1.1899-13.1912.

Conway, James J. “Out on the Town: Magnus Hirschfeld and Berlin’s Third Sex.” June 7, 2022. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/out-on-the-town?fbclid=IwAR0EdZNI7FNZ3ciu7wBCCIEOB8WCBc3FglAVjBJF7ZJ5fOrGT9U3v-3AVBM#p-1-1

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of National Archives and Records Administration, College Park. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/photo/the-institute-for-sexual-science




June is Pride Month

This Book is Banned - Pride Flag

This book is banned-Scarlet Books by and about the LGBTQ+ community are the most frequent targets of bans at public schools and libraries across the country. (Right up there with books about race, racism, or have characters of color.)[1] And these challenges explicitly state that young people shouldn’t be exposed to LGBTQ+ material.[2]

An extension of this thinking is evident in attempts by policymakers nationwide to prohibit drag shows and banning gender-affirming care. They’re also pushing to allow the deadnaming of transgender students or adults in the workplace, as well as other measures that target LGBTQ+ people.[3]

Books have the ability to give us a glimpse into lives and experiences other than our own, and Maia Kobabe’s graphic memoir Gender Queer is a perfect example. Unfortunately, according to the American Library Association (ALA) Gender Queer has been at the top of the banned book list for two years running (2021 and 2022).[4]

This Book is Banned-Gender Queer Cover

Kobabe, who uses e/em/eir pronouns, started writing this memoir as a way to explain to eir family what it means to be nonbinary and asexual. But Gender Queer turned out to be more than a personal story. It’s a touching, insightful and useful guide on gender identity for friends, advocates, and humans everywhere.[5]

Many other books are facing similar trials, including George M. Johnson’s All Boys Aren’t Blue, Mike Curato’s Flamer, Stephen Chbosky’s The Perks of Being a Wallflower, John Green’s Looking for Alaska, Jonathan Evison’s Lawn Boy and Juno Dawson’s This Book Is Gay.[6]

So, read a book from the ALA’s rainbow list in support of Pride Month. Or choose from books, like Gender Queer, that have received the Stonewall Book Award for exceptional merit relating to the gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender experience. But don’t limit choices from these lists to the month of June, show support for Pride year round.

Stonewall Honor Books in Literature

  • “Light From Uncommon Stars” by Ryka Aoki (Tor Books)
  • “Black Girl, Call Home” by Jasmine Mans (Berkley)
  • “Stone Fruit” by Lee Lai (Fantagraphic Books)
  • “A Psalm for the Wild-Built” by Becky Chambers (Tor Books)

Stonewall Honor Books in Non-Fiction

  • “Hidden Case of Ewan Forbes: And the Unwritten History of the Trans Experience” by Zoë Playdon (Scribner)
  • “A History of Scars” by Laura Lee (Atria Paperback)
  • “Let the Record Show: A Political History of ACT UP New York, 1987-1993” by Sarah Schulman (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux)
  • “Punch Me Up to the Gods: A Memoir by Brian Broome (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt)

Stonewall Honor Books in Children’s and Young Adult Literature

  • “Almost Flying,” written by Jake Maia Arlow (Dial Books for Young Readers, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC)
  • The Darkness Outside Us,” written by Eliot Schrefer (Katherine Tegen Books, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers) [7]
Page Capper copy

#ALA Rainbow List       #Celebrations       #LGBTQ+ authors

Endnotes:

[1] Kasey Meehan, Jonathan Friedman. “Banned in the USA: State Laws Supercharge Book Suppression in Schools.” April 20, 2023. PEN America.https://pen.org/report/banned-in-the-usa-state-laws-supercharge-book-suppression-in-schools/

[2] Hillel Italie. “’Gender Queer’ tops library group’s list of challenged books.” AP News. https://apnews.com/article/most-challenged-books-2022-list-c39af4320afb16525cb0fd911c9ffed4

[3] Scott McFetridge, Anthony Izagirre and Sara Cline. “School library book bans are seen as targeting LGBTQ content.” March 20, 2023.  AP News. https://apnews.com/article/lgbtq-book-bans-91b2d4c086eb082cbecfdda2800ef29a

[4] Hillel Italie. “’Gender Queer’ tops library group’s list of challenged books.” AP News. https://apnews.com/article/most-challenged-books-2022-list-c39af4320afb16525cb0fd911c9ffed4

[5] Simon and Schuster.com  https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Gender-Queer-A-Memoir/Maia-Kobabe/9781549304002

[6] Hillel Italie. “’Gender Queer’ tops library group’s list of challenged books.” AP News. https://apnews.com/article/most-challenged-books-2022-list-c39af4320afb16525cb0fd911c9ffed4

[7] American Library Association. Stonewall Book Awards List. https://www.ala.org/rt/rrt/award/stonewall/honored

Images:

[1] Pride Flag. Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik.

[2] Gender Queer Cover. Kobabe, Maia. Gender Queer. Portland, Oregon: Oni Press, Deluxe edition (July 5, 2022).




Aphorisms Unplugged: It’s a Cakewalk

This Book is Banned_ Cakewalk

This Book is Banned_Scarlet Alphabet -All too often the context of popular expressions has been forgotten. Their original message is typically richer and more profound than our contemporary interpretation.

This Book is Banned proffers a few proverbs, sayings, and other pearls of wisdom that have been unplugged,” as it were. We’ve rebooted, gone back-to-basics, and re-discovered their intended message. In recognition of Juneteenth, we’re taking a look at the expression…

It’s a Cakewalk.

The phrase “It’s a cakewalk” is typically used to mean something so easy success is certain –  like Shakespeare getting an A in English class. It’s ironic, however, that this expression has come to mean something that’s absurdly easy, because the origin of this folk form is anything but easy.

These days a cakewalk is a musical game where participants promenade in a circle comprised of numbered spaces where players land when the music stops. If the number you end up on is drawn by the caller you win, and your prize is – you guessed it —a cake.[1]

The origin of the cakewalk, however, is dark and much more complicated than this appropriated version. Oral histories of enslaved people reveal that the cakewalk originated in the antebellum slave quarters of Southern plantations.[2]

The parents of ragtime musician Shepard Edmonds shared memories of their enslavement with him, and he explained that the dance typically took place on Sundays, when there was little work to be done. It was performed by young and old alike, in “hand-me-down finery,” and involved a prancing walk, high kicks, and personalized shuffles.[3]

Edmonds characterized the cakewalk as a “takeoff on the high manners of the folks in the ‘big house’.”[4]  The story that actor Leigh Whipple related about his childhood nurse, however, is more direct. Her account ends with the statement “we used to mock them, every step.”[5]

Plantation owners gathered around to watch the fun, but they clearly missed the satirical point. For, Edmonds’ parents also indicated that competition among enslaved couples “started with the master giving a cake to the couple that did the proudest movement” – hence the term cakewalk.[6]

Exceptional dancers were often taken from one plantation to another to compete in dancing contests with other enslaved Africans. Such competitions were typically betting events for the plantation owners, not unlike betting on the winner of a horserace.[7]

After the Civil War, the cakewalk became a mainstay of the minstrel show, with lavish, mammoth productions often in the guise of a “walkaround finale.”[8] With this turn of events, the cakewalk found a much wider audience, and it was so popular it became a fad.

In the meantime, a radically new form of music was emerging. Piano ragtime was an overnight obsession, and it rode in on the cakewalk.[9] Legendary ragtime composer Scott Joplin described this African-American tradition and referred to its history in his song The Ragtime Dance:

This Book is Banned_Scarlet Alphabet Let me see you do the rag-time dance,
Turn left and do the cakewalk prance,
Turn the other way and do the slow drag
Now take your lady to the World’s Fair
And do the rag-time dance.
[10]

Not surprisingly, for white writers of ragtime the music was less about a folk form being adapted to the needs of a new age than it was something to be commercially exploited. Even the famous bandleader John Phillip Sousa got into the act.

Sousa featured cakewalk syncopation in his performance at the 1900 Paris Exposition, as well as the 1904 World’s Fair in St. Louis. In 1908, the Impressionist composer Claude Debussy gave a nod to the cakewalk with his composition The Golliwog’s Cakewalk.[11]

It’s regrettable that, like many African-American folk forms, the cakewalk’s difficult history has been forgotten. In an effort to educate about the origins of this tradition, cakewalks are being incorporated into Juneteenth celebrations around the country… it’s a good start toward setting the record straight.

Page Capper copy

 #history      #Juneteenth      #cakewalk     #unplugged aphorisms 

Endnotes:

[1] Shrumm, Regan. “Who takes the cake? The history of the cakewalk.” May 18, 2016. Smithsonian Institute. https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/who-takes-cake-history-cakewalk

[2] Ghandi, Lakshmi. “The Extraordinary Story of Why a ‘Cakewalk’ Wasn’t Always Easy.” December 23, 2013. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2013/12/23/256566647/the-extraordinary-story-of-why-a-cakewalk-wasnt-always-easy

Shrumm, Regan. “Who takes the cake? The history of the cakewalk.” May 18, 2016. Smithsonian Institute. https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/who-takes-cake-history-cakewalk

[3] Baldwin, Brooke. “The Cakewalk: A Study in Stereotype and Reality.” Journal of Social History. Vol. 15 (1981) 208.

Shrumm, Regan. “Who takes the cake? The history of the cakewalk.” May 18, 2016. Smithsonian Institute. https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/who-takes-cake-history-cakewalk

Ghandi, Lakshmi. “The Extraordinary Story of Why a ‘Cakewalk’ Wasn’t Always Easy.” December 23, 2013. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2013/12/23/256566647/the-extraordinary-story-of-why-a-cakewalk-wasnt-always-easy

Moore, Alex. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Creation of American Dance 1619-1950. Global Studies Thesis. Hofstra University, 2010.

[4] Sundquist, Eric. To Wake The Nations: Race in The Making of American Literature. Boston: Belknap press, 1998.

Holstrom, David. “Community, Culture, and Black Experience.” Feb 5, 1993. The Christian Science Monitor. https://www.csmonitor.com/1993/0205/05101.html

[5] Baldwin, Brooke. “The Cakewalk: A Study in Stereotype and Reality.” Journal of Social History. Vol. 15 (1981) 208.

[6] Rudi Blesh and Harriet Janis. They All Played Ragtime. New York: Oak Publications, 1971. Pg 96. https://archive.org/details/theyallplayedrag00bles/page/96/mode/2up?q=edmonds&view=theater

[7] Stearns, Marshall and Jean. Jazz Dance: The Story of American Vernacular Dance.  New York: Da Capo Press, 1994. Pp 22-23.

[8] Baldwin, Brooke. “The Cakewalk: A Study in Stereotype and Reality.” Journal of Social History. Vol. 15 (1981) 211.

[9] Baldwin, Brooke. “The Cakewalk: A Study in Stereotype and Reality.” Journal of Social History. Vol. 15 (1981) 211.

Rudi Blesh and Harriet Janis. They All Played Ragtime. New York: Oak Publications, 1971. Pg 13. https://archive.org/details/theyallplayedrag00bles/page/96/mode/2up?q=edmonds&view=theater

[10] Words and Music by Scott Joplin. The Ragtime Dance (1902). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGgS6iGPEaE

[11] Rudi Blesh and Harriet Janis. They All Played Ragtime. New York: Oak Publications, 1971. Pp 74-75. https://archive.org/details/theyallplayedrag00bles/page/96/mode/2up?q=edmonds&view=theater

Stearns, Marshall and Jean. Jazz Dance: The Story of American Vernacular Dance.  New York: Da Capo Press, 1994. Pg 123.

Gammond, Peter. Scott Joplin and the Ragtime Era. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975. Pg 39.

Image: 

Creator: Michael Ochs Archives Credit: Getty Images 




Right to Read Day – April 24, 2023

This Book is Banned_Right to Read Day, 2023

he American Library Association (ALA) has designated April 24, 2023 as the inaugural Right to Read Day. More than simple acknowledgement, it’s a national day of advocacy and action! The ALA is calling on readers, library lovers, and free speech advocates everywhere to defend their right to read freely, and take concrete action to preserve it:

  • Check out a library book that’s at risk of being banned.
  • Write a letter speaking out against book banning to the editor of your local newspaper, or an elected leader.
  • Let your voice be heard at a meeting of your library board, school board, or other local officials.
  • Organize a peaceful public event in support of libraries.
  • Report censorship to the Office for Intellectual Freedom.
  • Support, and spread the word about websites that speak out against censorship, sites like com

Right to Read Day also marks the first anniversary of Unite Against Banned Books, a public-facing advocacy campaign founded by the ALA to empower readers everywhere to stand together in the increasingly important fight against censorship.[1]

Since its launch in April 2022, Unite Against Book Bans has created a set of free advocacy resources for individuals, as well as providing direct support to community organizers. Get your toolkit here. [2]

But don’t limit your actions to Right to Read Day. Keep your activism against censorship going beyond April 24th. Continue to counter the small but vocal group of voices driving the current wave of book bans in schools and public libraries.

Let’s put the kibosh on this alarming surge in book bannings.

Page Capper copy

#celebrations        #on censorship           #book banning

Endnotes:

[1] “ALA calls for national day of action to protect the freedom to read, designates Right to Read Monday for 2023 National Library Week.”  March 17, 2023. ALA Member News. 

[2] Action Toolkit. Unite Against Book Bans. https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/toolkit/




Book Banning & Burning Throughout History

Here's a timeline of book banning and burning.

.

ook banning in America is rising at an alarming rate. In fact, an all-time high of nearly 1,500 bans were put in place during the first half of the 2022-2023 school year, affecting 874 unique titles.

Books are banned for a variety of ostensible claims. Their content may be labeled “offensive” on religious or political grounds, as well as justifications like explicit sexuality or “vulgar” language. Lately, LGBTQA+ themes, diversity and social concerns lead the list.

At different points in history, authors of banned books have been ostracized, jailed, exiled, or even threatened with death. These days, we’re seeing such tools levied at our librarians. Library professionals have become victims of harassment and public defamation. Several states have passed legislation threatening jail time for librarians, as well as school librarians and teachers, for lending “inappropriate” material. And libraries in Chicago were recently the targets of bomb threats.

Similarly, during certain historical periods, possessing a banned book was regarded as a heretical act or considered treasonous, and as such punishable by prison, torture, or in the most notorious regimes, capital punishment. Here’s a brief timeline of book bannings, burnings, and other censorship tactics:

259–210 BC: The Chinese emperor Shih Huang Ti is said to have buried 460 Confucian scholars alive, in order to control how history was written in his time. In 212 B.C., he burned all the books in his kingdom, keeping a single copy of each for his Royal Library—and even those were destroyed before his death. Since all historical records had been eradicated, history could be said to begin with him.

8 CE: The Roman poet Ovid was banished from Rome for writing erotic poetry, Ars Amatoria (The Art of Love), which undermined Emperor Augustus’ agenda of moral reform. He was exiled to Tomis, the ends of the Roman Empire, if not the world. Savonarola later burned all of Ovid’s works in Florence during 1497, and U.S. Customs banned an English translation of Ars Amatoria in 1928.

35: The Roman emperor Caligula banned the reading of Homer’s The Odyssey, written more than 300 years earlier. Caligula considered the epic poem dangerous because it expressed Greek ideas of freedom.

640: According to legend, the caliph Omar burned every volume in the library at Alexandria in Egypt, all 200,000 of them. He did so because: “If these writings of the Greeks agree with the Book of God they are useless and need not be preserved; if they disagree, they are pernicious and ought to be destroyed.” On the upside, burning all these books provided six months’ fuel to warm the city’s baths.

1497–98: Savonarola was a powerful Florentine religious fanatic with a large following. He was also one of the most notorious censors of all time. During these years, he incited great “bonfires of the vanities” which burned books and paintings by some of the most renowned artists in Florence. He persuaded the artists themselves to surrender their works to the bonfires. A number of poets became convinced that their lines were wicked and impure, so they decided to stop writing in verse. Popular songs were condemned, and turned into hymns with pious lyrics. The final bonfire was lit in 1498, only this time, it was under Savonarola as he hung from a cross. Ironically, all his sermons, essays, and other writings were burned with him.

1525: Six thousand copies of William Tyndale’s English translation of the New Testament, which had been printed in Germany and smuggled into England, were burned by the English church. Church authorities mandated that the Bible only be available in Latin.

1559: At this point, the Roman Catholic Church had been listing books prohibited to its members for hundreds of years, but in this year, Pope Paul IV established the Index Librorum Prohibitorum. And for more than 400 years this remained the definitive list of books Roman Catholics were prohibited from reading. It was clearly one of the most powerful censorship tools in the world.

1597: Shakespeare’s Richard II originally contained a scene in which the king was deposed from his throne. Queen Elizabeth I was so angry that she ordered it removed from all copies of the play. The scene didn’t appear in the printed version of Richard II until 1608, during the reign of James I.

1614: King James I, on the other hand, banned Sir Walter Raleigh’s book The History of the World. Raleigh wrote the book while imprisoned in London Tower by James I, and perhaps unsurprisingly, it was banned for “being too saucy in censuring princes.”

1624: The Pope had Martin Luther’s German translation of the Bible burned, in Germany no less.

1633: The Catholic Church banned Galileo’s Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. This is the book that championed Copernicus’ model of the universe, which put the sun at the center of the universe rather than the earth. Charged with “vehement suspicion of heresy” and under threat of torture, Galileo was not only forced to renounce his belief in the Copernican model, he was placed under house arrest for the rest of his life.

1644:  Thomas Morton’s New English Canaan is considered the first book to be banned in the United States (to be technically accurate, what would become the US). Though Morton arrived in Massachusetts with the Pilgrims, he wasn’t on board with the strict, insular Puritan society they set out to build. Morton set up a dissenting colony, and seemingly went out of his way to be a perpetual thorn in the side of its Governor, William Bradford. New English Canaan is Morton’s harsh, satirical critique of Puritan social order in general, and the contemptible treatment the New World was receiving at the hands of these Pilgrims. The book was written from England where Morton was involved in a lawsuit against the Massachusetts Bay Company. Upon his return to Massachusetts in 1644, Morton was arrested for the publication of New English Canaan, and exiled to Maine where he died in 1647.

1720: Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe was placed on the Index Librorum by the Spanish Catholic Church for heresy. Crusoe’s obsession with odds and likelihoods, as exhibited in his study of weather patterns and his ability to predict seasons of rain and drought, is seen as the art of conjuring.

1744: Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther was published in this year, and soon became popular throughout Europe. The book is a short novel about a young man’s sufferings from a failed love affair. And the final chapter of the book graphically depicts Werther’s suicide. The Lutheran church condemned it as immoral because several copycat suicides followed the publication of the book.  Governments in Italy, Denmark, and Germany followed suit and also banned the book. Two hundred years later, American sociologist David Phillips wrote about the triggering effect of publicized suicide, titling his book The Werther Effect.

1788: In deference to the insanity of the reigning monarch, King George III, Shakespeare’s King Lear was banned from the stage until 1820.

1807: Dr. Thomas Bowdler published a sanitized collection of Shakespeare’s plays. The preface of his first volume claimed that he had eliminated “everything that can raise a blush on the cheek of modesty.” This ultimately amounted to roughly 10 per cent of the playwright’s texts. The word “bowdlerize” has since became incorporated into the English language, meaning to modify passages considered vulgar or otherwise objectionable.

1843: The English Parliament updated an act requiring all plays performed in England to be submitted to the Lord Chamberlain for approval. Despite objections by renowned playwrights like George Bernard Shaw (in 1909), the Lord Chamberlain retained this power until 1968.

1853: Many historians point to Harriet Beecher Stowe’s anti-slavery novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, as the first book in the United States to be banned on a national scale. That “nation,” however, was the Southern Confederacy. Even so, the banning began years before the Confederate states seceded. From the instant it was published, Uncle Tom’s Cabin outraged people in the south, who labeled it “slanderous” to a criminal degree. This resulted in situations like a bookseller in Mobile, Alabama being run out of town for selling it. Stowe’s novel continues to come under fire, but these days it’s primarily because of the book’s racially charged language.

1859: Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, which introduced the theory of evolution, was published. In the same year, the book was banned from the library of Trinity College, Cambridge, the very school where Darwin had been a student. On the Origin of Species was also at the heart of the 1925 American legal case commonly referred to as the Scope’s Monkey Trial (formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes). The case challenged Tennessee’s Butler Act, which made it illegal to teach human evolution in state-funded schools.

1859: George Eliot’s novel Adam Bede was condemned as the “vile outpourings of a lewd woman’s mind,” and the book was removed from libraries in Britain.

1864–1959: Victor Hugo’s novel Les Misérables was placed on the Index Librorum because the Church was wary of political revolution, and remained on the Index until 1959. Not only did Victor Hugo support the French Revolution, in the nineteenth century, “liberty, fraternity and equality” were quite literally “fighting words.”

1881: Boston’s district attorney threatened to ban Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass (published in 1833) unless the book was bowdlerized. There was so much public uproar that Whitman was able to buy a house with the proceeds from the additional book sales.

1885: A year after of Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn was published, the library of Concord, Massachusetts decided to remove the book from its shelves. The decision-making committee said the book was “rough, coarse and inelegant, dealing with a series of experiences not elevating,” further stating that “the whole book being more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people.” It is said that by 1907 Twain’s novel had been abolished from some library somewhere every year, mostly because its hero was seen as setting a bad example for impressionable young readers.

1927: A translation of The Arabian Nights by French scholar J. C. Mardrus was held up by U.S. Customs. Though a translation by Sir Richard Burton was deemed less objectionable and allowed into the country four years later, the ban on the Mardrus version was maintained.

1929: Jack London’s popular novel Call of the Wild was banned in Italy and Yugoslavia. However, it was not the harsh undertones and mistreatment of animals that brought about this ban. It was London’s Socialist politics, which ran afoul of fascist regimes who considered it “too radical.” The Nazi Party also burned several of London’s “socialist-friendly” books like The Iron Heel in 1933.

1929: The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was banned in the Soviet Union because of its references to, and Doyle’s advocacy of, “occultism” and spiritualism.

1929–80: Novels by Ernest Hemingway were banned in various parts of the world, including Italy, and Germany, as well as the U.S. Banned by Mussolini himself,  A Farewell to Arms contains a glaringly-accurate account of the Italian retreat from Caporetto, which depicted the cowardice of the soldiers as well as the atrocities they committed. It was also challenged by the Vernon-Verona-Sherill, N.Y., School district in 1980 as a “sex novel.” All of Hemingway’s books were burned in the Nazi bonfires for “being a monument of modern decadence.” In 1941, the U.S. Post Office declared For whom the Bell Tolls unfit to mail because it was seen as pro-Communist. Hemingway’s books are frequently challenged for “vulgar” words, which he felt conveyed important truths about war and love. In 1962, a group called “Texans for America” went so far as to oppose any textbooks that refer students to books by the Nobel Prize-winning author.

1931: Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll was banned by the governor of Hunan province in China. The reason for the banning is that animals shouldn’t use human language, and that it is disastrous to put animals and humans on the same level.

1932: In a letter to an American publisher, James Joyce indicated that “some very kind person” bought out the entire first edition of his novel Dubliners and had it burned. The New York Society for the suppression of Vice argued to have Joyce’s novel Ulysses labeled obscene, and it was banned in the U.S. until 1933.

1933: A series of massive bonfires took place in Nazi Germany, which burned thousands of books written by Jewish authors, communists, and others. In addition to those already mentioned, this included works of John Dos Passos, Albert Einstein, Sigmund Freud, Helen Keller, Lenin, Thomas Mann, Karl Marx, Erich Maria Remarque, Upton Sinclair, Stalin, and Leon Trotsky.

1953: The Irish government banned a number of books for immorality, including Anatole France’s A Mummer’s Tale, all the works of Emile Zola, most novels by William Faulkner, as well all of John Steinbeck’s books, which were banned for subversion and immorality.

1954: Mickey Mouse comics were banned in East Berlin because the cartoon character was said to be an “anti-Red rebel.”

1959: After protests by the White Citizens’ Council, Garth Williams’ picture book for children The Rabbits’ Wedding was restricted to the reserved shelf in Alabama public libraries because it was seen as promoting racial integration.

1960: The year after England passed a new Obscene Publications Act, D.H. Lawrence’s novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover was the subject of a trial, in which Penguin Books was prosecuted for publishing an obscene book. During the proceedings, the prosecutor asked whether Lady Chatterley’s Lover is “a book you would wish your wife or servant to read?” Ultimately, Penguin won the case, and the book was allowed to be sold in England.

1973: School officials in Drake, North Dakota voted to withdraw Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five from the curriculum, citing “obscene language,” and “explicit sex scenes.” Most students, however, didn’t want to give up their copy of the novel. So, lockers were searched, books confiscated, and all 32 copies were ultimately burned in the school’s furnace.

1977: Maurice Sendak’s picture book In the Night Kitchen, was removed from the school library in Norridge, Illinois because of “nudity to no purpose.” The book features a boy who dreams he falls out of his pajamas and into a bowl of cake batter, and was ranked #25 on the American Library Association’s list of 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-2000.

1980s: During an evaluation of school materials, the London County Council banned the use of Beatrix Potter’s The Tale of Peter Rabbit and Benjamin Bunny from all London schools. These classic tales were prohibited because the stories only portrayed “middle-class rabbits.”

1983: Members of the Alabama State Textbook Committee called for the exclusion of The Diary of Anne Frank because it was “a real downer.”

1987: I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou was eliminated from the required reading list for Wake County, North Carolina high school students because of a scene in which Angelou, at the age of seven and a half, is raped.

1998: The Kenyan government banned 30 different books and publications for “sedition and immorality,” among them The Quotations of Chairman Mao, and Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses.

2001: A pastor in New Mexico lead his congregation in a bonfire fueled by Stephen King novels, AC/DC records, and a number of other books, because they were “the work of the devil.” Church members sang Amazing Grace as they threw the books and records into the fire.

2006: Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale was deleted from an advanced placement English curriculum in the Judson, Texas school district. Overruling a committee of teachers, students, and parents, the superintendent banned the book after another parent complained about its sexual nature, and stated that it was offensive to Christians.

2010: The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon was removed from the summer reading program in Lake Fenton, Michigan after parents objected to the novel’s “profane” language. Some parents have also insisted the book be eliminated from school reading lists because they feel it promotes atheism.

2016: The American Library Association’s report for this year included an anecdote by Daily Show writer Daniel Radosh regarding the irony of his son’s school requiring a signed permission slip in order to read Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. The irony lies in the fact that Bradbury’s novel is a cautionary tale about the dangers of banning books. In true satirical Daily Show fashion, “Radosh wrote a thank-you note to the teacher, saying the permission slip was ‘a wonderful way to introduce students to the theme of Fahrenheit 451.”

2019: St. Edward Catholic School in Nashville removed J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series from its library for reasons involving witchcraft. The pastor was worried that readers actually risk “conjuring evil spirits.”

2022: Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill has several Florida schools removing significant numbers of books from their libraries. There’s also the Sunshine State’s “Stop W.O.K.E. Act” (officially the Individual Freedom Act), which PEN America describes as an “educational gag order.” This law has Florida teachers removing or covering all the books in their classroom libraries until they have been “vetted” by the proper authorities. Dozens of books were ultimately removed after they were objected to by a single person.

In the 2021-2022 school year 565 books have been banned in Florida schools. Some were banned permanently, though other bans were temporary pending investigation. Either way, the result is the same: Students have lost access to books.

The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) has put together annual bibliographies of books that have been challenged, restricted, or banned since 1990. These lists are based on information gathered from media stories, and challenge reports submitted to the OIF from communities throughout the U.S.

Sources:

ABC News
American Library Association – ala.org
American Libraries Magazine
Associated Press
BBC News
Catholic Lane – catholiclane.com
Chance and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Realism, Probability, Magic by Jesse Molesworth.
Chicago Sun Times.
Christian Science Monitor – csmonitor.com
Freedom to Read Week – freedomtoread.ca
History Answers – historyanswers.co.uk
History – history.com
Literary Hub – lithub.com
PEN America – pen.org
Politics and Prose Bookstore – politics-prose.com
Royal Collection Trust – rct.uk
San  Diego Free Press. https://sandiegofreepress.org/2014/09/americas-first-banned-book-and-the-battle-for-the-soul-of-the-country/#.YbuTIX3MIb0
Sir Walter Raleigh’s History of the World by Charles H. Firth.
Smithsonian Magazine – smithsonianmag.com
SocialBooksheves.com
“The Cause of Ovid’s Exile” by G. P. Goold in Illinois Classical Studies.
“The Censorship of the Deposition Scene in Richard II” by Janet Clare in The Review of English Studies.
The New York Times
The Nobel Prize Website – nobelprize.org
The Online books Page – onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu
The Washington Post – washingtonpost.com
World.edu Global education network — world.edu
World History Encyclopedia —  https://www.worldhistory.org/New_English_Canaan/

FYI:

This Book is Banned participates in the Amazon.com affiliate program, where we earn a small commission by linking to books (but the price remains the same to you).  This allows us to remain free, and ad free. [Our privacy policy]